Free Will
- Thread starter Aetheryn
- Start date
beloved57
Well-known member
Evasion! Does Rom 8:8 read
A. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God. or
B. So then they that are in the flesh have a choice to please God.
popsthebuilder
New member
He has the freedom to accept the Word and truth given him through GOD, and the freedom to turn from the Word, the truth, and strive to attain their own wants.
How is that not freedom of choice?
peace
Sent from my Alcatel_6055U using Tapatalk
Holly Spirit does great work through preaching of men just like your church if you do to one. Meshak doesn't believe in church.
Preachers are allowed according to the Bible
popsthebuilder
New member
What? Freedom of choice is not a drug homie. Though to follow what is good and right can bring about some natural high. I think hey call it high on life. There is potential and consiquince, neither of which would be warranted or just if we lacked some level of freedom.Free will is by it's very definition a doctrine of man.
It is nothing more than a narcotic that inebriates the faculty of the brain which governs theology
peace
Sent from my Alcatel_6055U using Tapatalk
Last edited:
popsthebuilder
New member
They can use their freewill to follow after hearing.
Sent from my Alcatel_6055U using Tapatalk
Nanja
Well-known member
Right. God knows the end from the beginning.
They're wasting thier own time, sad
Uhh-hummm, yeah, I already did answer: it took about twenty five minutes to write it out, (double checking pertinent passages as I wrote), but it only took you two minutes to read all of it, one minute to digest what was said, and another minute to reply back with your fabulously crafted response which consisted of the statement, "What you are saying is senseless." That is a total of four minutes and anyone who looks at the size of my post, and when you responded back, (four minutes later), will see that what I say is true. Then, when I strongly hinted at this fact in my next post that followed, (lol), you responded by stating that I was wasting your time, (lololol). Why would I want to waste four more of your precious minutes by spending another half hour writing out another response for you? I do not have a half hour to spend rebutting every four minute segment of your life or the illustrious wording in your wondrous one minute quips you call responding. In fact I am going to say for now that you are not even a real person by the way you interact around here. Yep, you are nothing more than a Calvin flavored drone, not capable of thinking for yourself because you left your will at Calvin's doorstep; and he stepped on it and dragged half of it across the lawn on the bottom of his shoe on his way to the quickymart.
Total depravity to me means men don't understand how God knows beginning and end at the same time and how He is there as well. I'm not able to zip around like that.
beloved57
Well-known member
Its a simple yes or no. If you say no, then that means man does not have freewill.Uhh-hummm, yeah, I already did answer: it took about twenty five minutes to write it out, (double checking pertinent passages as I wrote), but it only took you two minutes to read all of it, one minute to digest what was said, and another minute to reply back with your fabulously crafted response which consisted of the statement, "What you are saying is senseless." That is a total of four minutes and anyone who looks at the size of my post, and when you responded back, (four minutes later), will see that what I say is true. Then, when I strongly hinted at this fact in my next post that followed, (lol), you responded by stating that I was wasting your time, (lololol). Why would I want to waste four more of your precious minutes by spending another half hour writing out another response for you? I do not have a half hour to spend rebutting every four minute segment of your life or the illustrious wording in your wondrous one minute quips you call responding. In fact I am going to say for now that you are not even a real person by the way you interact around here. Yep, you are nothing more than a Calvin flavored drone, not capable of thinking for yourself because you left your will at Calvin's doorstep; and he stepped on it and dragged half of it across the lawn on the bottom of his shoe on his way to the quickymart.
Sent from my 5054N using TheologyOnline mobile app
Nanja
Well-known member
Of course they can't, it's still a fact, though.
1 Cor. 2:14
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
I skim your post so you wouldn't waste too much of my time while I waste my time writing to idiots as well. You babble a lot with celestial languages and comes from unfamiliar places that claims God's words are full of errors. You try to foolishly correct them.
This is a bad comparison but just the idea. I think of men taking a look at medusa and turns to stone. I believe Adam's body was different before he ate the Apple. I guess Eve looked better with an apple in her hand. Nude. When he ate the Apple, his body turned to something else as well. Some sort of deep hardened shame even a leaf could cover it up. Like a person turning to stone after looking at medusa. Like that, I'm born in a stone like form full of molecules and a sinner sinning. Forget those sinless birth fables. Adam has been like the stone statue ever since. Think of statues having baby statues ever since. That's totally depravity to me. We're all born of stone hearts due to Adam having one. A bit hard or stoney. You teach a human being can give birth to a fish based on free will. Get over it. Our free will are used only according to to our natural desires. We're limited like the stone statues. Calvin like lot of others teach we use choices based on our natural abilities.
Most here say Calvin don't when he did or does. A denial of real history that happened for real. We're still not sure about you being on a UFO. You sure fly around a lot. Have no idea where you got free will to do that.
Wow, my dad is bigger than your dad philosophy is old. Please shorten your babbles.Uhh-hummm, yeah, I already did answer: it took about twenty five minutes to write it out, (double checking pertinent passages as I wrote), but it only took you two minutes to read all of it, one minute to digest what was said, and another minute to reply back with your fabulously crafted response which consisted of the statement, "What you are saying is senseless." That is a total of four minutes and anyone who looks at the size of my post, and when you responded back, (four minutes later), will see that what I say is true. Then, when I strongly hinted at this fact in my next post that followed, (lol), you responded by stating that I was wasting your time, (lololol). Why would I want to waste four more of your precious minutes by spending another half hour writing out another response for you? I do not have a half hour to spend rebutting every four minute segment of your life or the illustrious wording in your wondrous one minute quips you call responding. In fact I am going to say for now that you are not even a real person by the way you interact around here. Yep, you are nothing more than a Calvin flavored drone, not capable of thinking for yourself because you left your will at Calvin's doorstep; and he stepped on it and dragged half of it across the lawn on the bottom of his shoe on his way to the quickymart.
66 book Bible isn't false doctrine. Maybe your other 7 isThis is exactly why your false doctrine deserves to be destroyed.
Are babies in the flesh? Are children who are under the age of accountability in the flesh? They are innocent. So if a baby or child dies before coming to know God as their Savior, do they go to Heaven or Hell?
Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
A man who has not chosen to repent of his sins will not please God.
Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
Your Charles Taze Russell teaches false doctrines
Age of accountability is false doctrine