Quote:
Originally Posted by steko
Yeshua the Messiah to Israel during that time.
Rom 15:8 Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers:
Christianity is Jew and Gentile in one body.
I claim? The Lord Jesus said it.
1] How does what Steko wrote make Christ not the Christ?
2] You are blind to what you are doing.
3] And because you are; there is no getting through to you.
4] How are you blind? As follows...
Your response to Steko - that I have quoted here - makes it obvious that you did not read Steko's words.
5] What you did was read what you concluded he meant.
6] You then believed that was what he meant, and then responded to it - from what you read into his words.
Where in his reply did his words indicate Jesus is not/was not always the Christ?
6] This is exactly why no one - not even the Spirit through His Word; the Scriptures - can get through to you.
7] Because you read what you think is being spoken about in the passages into and then conclude you understood what It was talking about.
8] You are blind to your doing this because you refuse to actually observe yourself doing this as you sit there and the passages.
You are like some child playing under the sink, and drinking the Draino when it becomes thirsty "because water is for thirst, water is a liquid, this bottle [Draino] has liquid in it and I am thirsty..."
9] You don't even know what I meant by that example; do you?
10] And, no, I am not debating with you. Debate involves at least two people who each know they are talking about.
Rather, I am doing what just about everyone on here ends up having to do with you - correct you.
11] Not that you have a clue about anything I said or you would prove that you do.
12] You are blind...
13] Blind...
14] Blind...
15] I truly feel sorry for you that you do not even know what I am talking about in this post.
16] Shut everyone up. Explain what I am talking about in this post, even if you do not agree with it.
18] You won't be able to; because you have made yourself blind by your own poor habit of reading what you think is being discussed into what you are reading.
"Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;" Titus 1:13.
19] I add that passage about believers to believers because I am still not sure if you are lost or saved. I am dead certain you are clueless. Of that much I have no doubt.
20] So clueless you don't know which came first - belief in the Cross or what you now profess. You are that clueless about salvation - you don't even know that moment of you own, if it took place or not, or how, or when - all you have is your confused report after what ever actually took place.
21] I use that passage because you leave me like the Calvinist does - not a clue about how he ended up saved - just that he ended up saved and here is the manmade formula as to its details.
That is you in your own version of that mess.
22] Now watch you conclude I am calling you a Calvinist...
Originally Posted by steko
Yeshua the Messiah to Israel during that time.
Rom 15:8 Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers:
Christianity is Jew and Gentile in one body.
I claim? The Lord Jesus said it.
1] How does what Steko wrote make Christ not the Christ?
2] You are blind to what you are doing.
3] And because you are; there is no getting through to you.
4] How are you blind? As follows...
Your response to Steko - that I have quoted here - makes it obvious that you did not read Steko's words.
5] What you did was read what you concluded he meant.
6] You then believed that was what he meant, and then responded to it - from what you read into his words.
Where in his reply did his words indicate Jesus is not/was not always the Christ?
6] This is exactly why no one - not even the Spirit through His Word; the Scriptures - can get through to you.
7] Because you read what you think is being spoken about in the passages into and then conclude you understood what It was talking about.
8] You are blind to your doing this because you refuse to actually observe yourself doing this as you sit there and the passages.
You are like some child playing under the sink, and drinking the Draino when it becomes thirsty "because water is for thirst, water is a liquid, this bottle [Draino] has liquid in it and I am thirsty..."
9] You don't even know what I meant by that example; do you?
10] And, no, I am not debating with you. Debate involves at least two people who each know they are talking about.
Rather, I am doing what just about everyone on here ends up having to do with you - correct you.
11] Not that you have a clue about anything I said or you would prove that you do.
12] You are blind...
13] Blind...
14] Blind...
15] I truly feel sorry for you that you do not even know what I am talking about in this post.
16] Shut everyone up. Explain what I am talking about in this post, even if you do not agree with it.
18] You won't be able to; because you have made yourself blind by your own poor habit of reading what you think is being discussed into what you are reading.
"Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;" Titus 1:13.
19] I add that passage about believers to believers because I am still not sure if you are lost or saved. I am dead certain you are clueless. Of that much I have no doubt.
20] So clueless you don't know which came first - belief in the Cross or what you now profess. You are that clueless about salvation - you don't even know that moment of you own, if it took place or not, or how, or when - all you have is your confused report after what ever actually took place.
21] I use that passage because you leave me like the Calvinist does - not a clue about how he ended up saved - just that he ended up saved and here is the manmade formula as to its details.
That is you in your own version of that mess.
22] Now watch you conclude I am calling you a Calvinist...
Last edited:
