You really must have some form of dementia.
Paul said to follow Paul as he follows Christ. We've given you the scripture you lying piece of filth.
That he/she is, a habitual liar, littering this site with his satanic Preterist dung....
You really must have some form of dementia.
Paul said to follow Paul as he follows Christ. We've given you the scripture you lying piece of filth.
He will come back with his trifecta, and stump us all:
1. No one taught dispensationalism until.......................Darby....Josephus...Wikipedia....Darby....Bullinger.....Vision of a teenage girl....Darby......
2. No MADist can/will answer.....
3. Why don't you believe what "Jesus"/Paul says..........?
Cricket....cricket.....cricket....
Hmmmphhhh...............
Tet,
Tell us what mystery Christ revealed in parable form that is the same as what was later revealed through Paul.
2 Thess 2:7...is the same mystery Jesus gave in the parable of the weeds.
His 2 Peter objection was dealt with months ago.
No it wasn't.
2 Peter 3:15-16 completely refutes MAD's two gospel theory.
Peter makes it clear that Paul had previously written to Peter's audience. Peter also said that Paul wrote the same way in all his letters.
When Paul had previously written to these same Galatians that Peter was preaching to, Paul told those Galatians that if anyone preaches another gospel they are to be accursed.
Since MAD claims Peter preached a different gospel, then Peter should have been accursed.
Peter wasn't accursed because Peter didn't preach a different gospel than Paul.
MAD is a mess.
Then it wasn't musterion, a previously hidden secret. Which means Paul lied.
No it wasn't.
2 Peter 3:15-16 completely refutes MAD's two gospel theory.
Peter makes it clear that Paul had previously written to Peter's audience. Peter also said that Paul wrote the same way in all his letters.
When Paul had previously written to these same Galatians that Peter was preaching to, Paul told those Galatians that if anyone preaches another gospel they are to be accursed.
Since MAD claims Peter preached a different gospel, then Peter should have been accursed.
Peter wasn't accursed because Peter didn't preach a different gospel than Paul.
MAD is a mess.
Guess you need to read Galatians 2 again.
You have comprehension trouble, you read things that aren't there.
Paul wasn't the first to find out about the mysteries hidden since the foundation of the world.
Jesus was the first to speak about the mysteries hidden since the foundation of the world. These mysteries pertained to the kingdom of God.
Jesus gave the parable of the weeds (wheat and tares)
The parable described the time period from 30AD to 70AD. The harvest occurred in 70AD.
Probably in the late 50's or early 60's, the Apostle Paul said the following:
(2 Thess 2:7 KJV) For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
The mystery Paul describes in 2 Thess 2:7, and when taken in it's full context (2 Thess 2:1-12) is the same mystery Jesus gave in the parable of the weeds.
Chapter, verse, re. this....
"The parable described the time period from 30AD to 70AD. The harvest occurred in 70AD."
Who taught you this "recent invention" of AD 70-ism, you clown?
Give us a name. Go on record and state that you learned it all, by jusat reading the bible.
You big, fat Preterist fraud, engager in sophistry, and deceit.
Gal 2:2 completely refutes MAD's two gospel theory.
(Gal 2:2) I went in response to a revelation and, meeting privately with those esteemed as leaders, I presented to them the gospel that I preach among the Gentiles. I wanted to be sure I was not running and had not been running my race in vain.
If Paul had been given a different gospel, why did Paul go to Jerusalem and meet in private with leaders in Jerusalem to make sure he wasn't preaching in vain?
If Paul's gospel was different, how the heck would the leaders in Jerusalem be able to tell Paul if he was preaching in vain or not if they had never heard about this new gospel.
MAD is a mess.
Satan's backup just arrived on thread.
If the content of what Paul called a now-revealed secret - and he said that it was - had already been revealed, he lied.
Are you saying Paul lied?
Satanism-one piece of good news in the book, and that his patron saint, his saint Judas, his "spiritual" brother, preached the good news of 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV, per Luke 9:6 KJV.
Answer my questions, pawn of Satan.
You and Musterian along with StP are the Satanists.
LA