This is slander. What about abortionists who pretend to be Christian?Sanctimonious hypocrisy. Many Re-publican politicians who claim to be faithful Christians privately mock God, violate His will and promote wickedness.
This is slander. What about abortionists who pretend to be Christian?Sanctimonious hypocrisy. Many Re-publican politicians who claim to be faithful Christians privately mock God, violate His will and promote wickedness.
This is slander. What about abortionists who pretend to be Christian?
Republicans who endorsed, supported, promoted, and committed murder by abortion are fools.* Abortion Nationally is from the Republican Supreme Court:
- Republican U.S. Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun wrote Roe v. Wade.
- The 1973 Roe 7-to-2 opinion was approved with a Republican majority of five votes.
- The 1992 landmark Casey opinion upheld "abortion rights" though 8 Republicans and a single pro-life Democrat (who dissented) comprised the court.
- In 2002 Casey author and Republican Justice Antonin Scalia said, "I will also strike down a law that is the opposite of Roe v. Wade."
- In 2008 on ABC's 60 Minutes Scalia said, "there are anti-abortion people who think that... the [constitution's] equal protection clause requires that you treat a helpless human being that's still in the womb the way you treat other human beings. I think that's wrong."
- In 2012 Republican Chief Justice John Roberts voted to uphold the socialist, pro-abortion Obamacare.
- In 2017 Republican Gorsuch became the poster-child for the "pro-life" movement's support for judges who reject the child's God-given right to life (see video below)
- From 1973 to 2020 every Republican justice on the court has agreed with the Democrat Party's platform and the central holding of Roe that the baby is not a person and has no right to life.
-- https://theologyonline.com/threads/trump-every-baby-precious-so-ban-late-term-abortion.53573/
- Colorado's Republican Governor John Love signed the nation's first permissive abortion law in 1967.
- The Republican Justices now on the Court (including Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts) oppose personhood.
- All six Republican judges on the 11th circuit (nominated by Reagan, Bush Sr. & George W. Bush) voted to kill Terri Schiavo.
- Republican "pro-life" heroine Priscilla Owen voted to abort "Baby 10" as a Texas Supreme Court judge.
- Republican "pro-life" hero Samuel Alito sided with Planned Parenthood in repeated 3rd-circuit rulings, including ruling to keep partial birth abortion legal.
- Republican George W. Bush refused to support South Dakota's total ban on abortion.
- Hundreds of pro-life laws that regulate abortion that will actually keep abortion legal after Roe is overturned such as the Informed Consent laws.
Or they are fooling the Democrats?Republicans who endorsed, supported, promoted, and committed murder by abortion are fools.
That is what the Roe Vs Wade was about. It was about the fact that abortion could not be stopped that easily.- From 1973 to 2020 every Republican justice on the court has agreed with the Democrat Party's platform and the central holding of Roe that the baby is not a person and has no right to life.
Or they are fooling you?Or they are fooling the Democrats?
They are fooling you.Or they are fooling you?
You've been fooled.They are fooling you.
Of course Hillary was not found guilty because the FBI refused to investigate her
Then...and Comey, a longtime family friend illegitimately acting like God, forgave her of all her sins, releasing her from having to answer for her crimes.
Confidential means they don't want to tell the public. You are missing that fact.FALSE. She was investigated, but not indicted.
Then...
Why did Comey announce that he re-opened the investigation despite the inopportune moment ie just weeks away from election?
The emails were not of a confidential nature.
Comey was lying through his teeth. The FBI NEVER obtained sworn testimony from Hillary about her illegal use of a private server to conduct State Department business. That means the FBI never seriously investigated Hillary because crooks in top echelons of the FBI at the time were Trump-hating loyalists determined to help Hillary win the 2016 election.FALSE. She was investigated, but not indicted.
Then...
Why did Comey announce that he re-opened the investigation despite the inopportune moment ie just weeks away from election?
The emails were not of a confidential nature.
They read the emails which is the most relevant evidence. So, no real grounds to force testimony. Hillary would do fine just like when she was grilled for 10 hours about Bengazi.Comey was lying through his teeth. The FBI NEVER obtained sworn testimony from Hillary about her illegal use of a private server to conduct State Department business. That means the FBI never seriously investigated Hillary because crooks in top echelons of the FBI at the time were Trump-hating loyalists determined to help Hillary win the 2016 election
Baloney. Comey said he read more than 600,000 emails in a matter of days and found no classified material. That is a lie. Nobody reads that many emails that fast and it does not matter whether the emails had classified info on them or not, they were on a private server that Hillary knew for a fact was illegal.They read the emails which is the most relevant evidence. So, no real grounds to force testimony. Hillary would do fine just like when she was grilled for 10 hours about Bengazi.
Gee, are you up at arms over Bannon's refusal to obey subpoena? And what about Trump children and Trump himself in regard to Jan 6th? You will not criticize them for refusing to answer questions. Everything is a double standard with you.
In an appeal, judge overturned requirement to testify as Clinton's emails were already investigated by Congress, the State Department inspector general and the FBI, and she previously gave written answers in another lawsuit.
Gee... did Comey have employees? How many? He did estimate that it would takes weeks, but took only one week. It would depend on how long the emails were obviously. Which makes more sense: the emails were shorter than expected OR Comey's brilliant plan was to be thorough by announcing that the emails would be investigated (which was against precedent) and then not bother to look at them...?Baloney. Comey said he read more than 600,000 emails in a matter of days and found no classified material. That is a lie. Nobody reads that many emails that fast and it does not matter whether the emails had classified info on them or not, they were on a private server that Hillary knew for a fact was illegal.
So Trump's point is that he knows Hillary is guilty without having had read any of the emails and he knows better than those who did read the emails because they did it to fast? Quoting Trump as an authority on anything is a joke.FBI Affirms July Decision Not To Charge Clinton, After Review Of Weiner Emails
Director James Comey says the FBI's review of new emails involving Hillary Clinton doesn't change the decision not to press charges against Clinton over her use of a private server.www.npr.org
At a rally Sunday evening in Sterling Heights, Mich., Trump directly responded to Comey's new letter to Congress. "Right now, she's being protected by a rigged system," he told the crowd. "You can't review 650,000 new emails in eight days — you just can't do it, folks. Hillary Clinton is guilty."
Too many justice officials not willing to cover up for Hillary knew about the 650,000 emails recovered on Wiener's laptop, forcing Comey to publicly admit in late 2016 that the FBI had uncovered the emails. He then claimed his people had read through them and found nothing illegal, which was not true since they were all illegally kept on a private server against federal law. Comey's claims of Hillary's innocence fell short of convincing millions of Americans that it was OK for Hillary to break the law even if her supporters, like Comey, claimed no harm was done.Gee... did Comey have employees? How many? He did estimate that it would takes weeks, but took only one week. It would depend on how long the emails were obviously. Which makes more sense: the emails were shorter than expected OR Comey's brilliant plan was to be thorough by announcing that the emails would be investigated (which was against precedent) and then not bother to look at them...?
So Trump's point is that he knows Hillary is guilty without having had read any of the emails and he knows better than those who did read the emails because they did it to fast? Quoting Trump as an authority on anything is a joke.
President Trump was right. It was against the law for Hillary to conduct public and private business on her private server while serving as SOS. Congress subpoenaed the email records in 2014, prompting Hillary and her lawyers to delete 30,000 of them they claimed were not work-related. The FBI never examined those 30,000 emails before they were deleted. Only Hillary and her staff went through them to determine what to release and what not to release. That was a cover-up and illegal because she destroyed government property that was not hers to destroy.Gee... did Comey have employees? How many? He did estimate that it would takes weeks, but took only one week. It would depend on how long the emails were obviously. Which makes more sense: the emails were shorter than expected OR Comey's brilliant plan was to be thorough by announcing that the emails would be investigated (which was against precedent) and then not bother to look at them...?
So Trump's point is that he knows Hillary is guilty without having had read any of the emails and he knows better than those who did read the emails because they did it to fast? Quoting Trump as an authority on anything is a joke.
Congress asked Hillary and others for their government-owned email records in 2014.Gee... did Comey have employees? How many? He did estimate that it would takes weeks, but took only one week. It would depend on how long the emails were obviously. Which makes more sense: the emails were shorter than expected OR Comey's brilliant plan was to be thorough by announcing that the emails would be investigated (which was against precedent) and then not bother to look at them...?
So Trump's point is that he knows Hillary is guilty without having had read any of the emails and he knows better than those who did read the emails because they did it to fast? Quoting Trump as an authority on anything is a joke.
You set that out very succinctly, thank you.President Trump was right. It was against the law for Hillary to conduct public and private business on her private server while serving as SOS. Congress subpoenaed the email records in 2014, prompting Hillary and her lawyers to delete 30,000 of them they claimed were not work-related. The FBI never examined those 30,000 emails before they were deleted. Only Hillary and her staff went through them to determine what to release and what not to release. That was a cover-up and illegal because she destroyed government property that was not hers to destroy.