Fiona Hill: "The president was trying to stage a coup"

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
RINO, one of Trump’s favorite jabs for his fellow Republicans, stands for “Republican in Name Only.”
So Trump calls Democrats "Republican In Name Only". So what? Aren't you doing the same? Why should pointing out the fact that liars and/or deluded people are not what they say they are be characterized pejoratively as "jabs"?
 

way 2 go

Well-known member
91815_huxwoupdxklvy86_full.jpeg
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Is the QAnon shaman an unjustly persecuted political prisoner, or is he a member of Antifa who went to the Capitol on J6 pretending to protest the election to make J6ers look like fools?
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
Is the QAnon shaman an unjustly persecuted political prisoner, or is he a member of Antifa who went to the Capitol on J6 pretending to protest the election to make J6ers look like fools?
Could a non-protester make protesters look like fools? In whose eyes?

And who is saying the J6 protesters look like fools, other than lying fools? No one is.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Could a non-protester make protesters look like fools? In whose eyes?

And who is saying the J6 protesters look like fools, other than lying fools? No one is.
But Jacob Chansley, aka the QAnon Shaman, will only eat organic food, and I was told by a MAGA that only commie-libs insist on eating organic foods. So he must be a commie-lib. If so, then he must be Antifa and not MAGA, which means he is an FBI plant. It sounds logical. Shirley you must agree?
 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
The videos released by Tucker Carlson have destroyed the OP of this thread.
The Democrats can all see the same clips Tucker is showing. Why can they not get those clips to harmonize with their tale?

Democrats: "Everything we need to corroborate our narrative happens to be entirely contained in the J6 footage Tucker has NOT shown. THEREFORE, we need him to not show ANY of the J6 footage."
 

marke

Well-known member
Well, it hardly comes as any surprise that Carlson has once again spoken out of both sides of his mouth but what are the odds that the far right brigade will still adulate the guy and Fox "News" even though they're effectively insulting their target audience? Bad news for the MAGA! crowd that he really wasn't a fan of Donald J Trump...


The White House has joined in the condemnation of Fox News host Tucker Carlson over his recent coverage of the January 6 Capitol riot. Spokesperson Andrew Bates called him “not credible” and slated his “ false depiction of the unprecedented, violent attack on our Constitution and the rule of law”.

Meanwhile, Carlson told a colleague that he “passionately” hated Donald Trump, according to bombshell new text messages released as part of Dominion Voting Systems’ $1.6bn defamation lawsuit against the network.



New court filings on Tuesday revealed a message Carlson sent to a Fox News employee just two days before the January 6 Capitol riot.

“We are very very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can’t wait,” he wrote. “I hate him passionately.”

The texts came to light the same day that both Democratic and Republican lawmakers slammed Carlson for sharing the edited footage of the Capitol riot on his show while falsely claiming it depicts a peaceful gathering led by “sightseers”.

Senators Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell led the condemnation of the “shameful” coverage.
Lying leftists will never admit they lied even when the facts prove they lied.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Is that a "Yes, it could be that I'm lying about the facts," or a "No, it could not be that I'm lying about the facts"? Which?
It is theoretically possible that any given individual could be lying about anything. If I have lied about anything, then demonstrate the lie.
 
Top