He was on Jan. 6. Don't you see?
So what he now says today in the light of evidence he did not have all the way back then equals what he was thinking all the way back then? You're out of your mind.
What he says now is what he wanted then.
Declaratory.
He didn't get it, so yes, the line held. Will it always hold? We can't know but we need to plan for that contingency.
His only practical option is another lawsuit, like I said. idk the statute of limitations on stolen elections.
If they're gunning for civil war, as many voices on the far right
I don't recognize that term. It's too ambiguous.
are, then yes, we should worry about the next nutcase to act on it.
To each his own. There's no actual reason to worry though.
You don't know that. You can declare it, but you can't know it. It's quite possible
the state of New York knows.
I can declare it confidently because if there's anybody, in the whole history of the whole world, who was actually a crook, and who was subjected to what he's been subjected to, then that person would have absolutely been arrested by now, and so far, and it's now approaching two whole years, he hasn't been. There's nobody who's ever been under as much scrutiny as former president Trump has since Jan 6----nobody. And still no arrests. None. Zero.
The silence is deafening. "It's quite possible the state of New York knows." Come on. Grasping at straws, and patently at this point.