Dispensationalism was taught by Paul long before 70 AD punk
More proof that Dispensationalists live in denial.
Dispensationalism didn't exist until Darby invented it in 1830.
Dispensationalism was taught by Paul long before 70 AD punk
All men are fallible.
I don't follow a belief system that was invented in 1830 by a fallible man.
All men are fallible.What I believe has been taught by reliable people who were qualified to teach others. That's why Preterism can be found being taught in every century since the first century and cannot be traced to one man, but Dispensationalism cannot be found until 1830 and can be traced to one man.
More proof that Dispensationalists live in denial.
Dispensationalism didn't exist until Darby invented it in 1830.
You are in denial
It's interesting that you include a quote from First Peter, but not Second Peter where he explains the delay based on what PAUL wrote and said.Nope.
I can back my claims with scripture. You have proven that you cannot.
(James 5:8 KJV) Be ye also patient; stablish your hearts: for the coming of the Lord draweth nigh.
(1 Cor 7:29 KJV) But this I say, brethren, the time is short: it remaineth, that both they that have wives be as though they had none;
(1 Peter 4:7 KJV) But the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore sober, and watch unto prayer.
(Heb 10:25 KJV) Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.
(Rev 22:10 KJV) And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand.
As we see above, the nearness of the coming of the Lord is confirmed by James, Paul, Peter, John, and the writer of Hebrews.
Darby followers have no explanation for these verses.
I can back my claims with scripture. You have proven that you cannot.
As we see above...
...have no explanation for these verses....
Please stop embarrassing yourself!
Let's look at what Paul said...
As I stated before, STP always purposely...
As we see...
...followers such as yourself claim to be followers of Paul.
If so, why did Paul say...
That's what you need to ask yourself...
The facts speak for themselves...
Why don't you believe the verses I posted?
I have a lot more than a "handful" of verses that support..
You don't have one verse that supports...
It's interesting that you include a quote from First Peter, but not Second Peter where he explains the delay based on what PAUL wrote and said.
Tet's growing list of Jerry-isms :chuckle:
You're quite the proof texter.You might want to read Jude after you read 2 Peter:
(2 Peter 3:3) Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires.
(Jude 18-19) They said to you, “In the last times there will be scoffers who will follow their own ungodly desires.” 19 These are the people who divide you, who follow mere natural instincts and do not have the Spirit.
You're quite the proof texter.
You're quite the proof texter.
More like cherry picker :crackup:
So shutup, Tet.
:rotfl:
Then why don't you believe all of them instead of the just the handful of verses that you base your false beliefs on?The scriptures speak for themselves.
Then why don't you believe all of them instead of the just the handful of verses that you base your false beliefs on?
Darby followers such as yourself claim to be followers of Paul.
If so, why did Paul say "the time is short"?
(1 Cor 7:29 KJV) But this I say, brethren, the time is short: it remaineth, that both they that have wives be as though they had none;
Surely a seasoned Paul follower such as yourself can explain to us why Paul said "the time is short" in the first century?
Then why don't you believe all of them instead of the just the handful of verses that you base your false beliefs on?