As everyone knows, little Craigie got beat up when he said that sophistry to Hilston, and bailed from the debate.
Why did you bail from the Hilston "debate," anti semite, Jew hater?
ECT Ever wonder why dispensationalism has become increasingly despised?
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
- Status
As everyone knows, little Craigie got beat up when he said that sophistry to Hilston, and bailed from the debate.
Why did you bail from the Hilston "debate," anti semite, Jew hater?
Why did you bail, from this whipping, Craigie?:
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...tai-Questions-the-Mid-Acts-View-Cannot-Answer
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...tai-Questions-the-Mid-Acts-View-Cannot-Answer
And most MADs, if not all; do NOT assert they are.
More denial from you guys.
Denying Dispensations are time periods is the same as denying Darby invented Dispensationalism.
Read heir's post, it was all about a time period.
If an era has a beginning and and end, guess what? IT'S A TIME PERIOD!!!
You guys claim the church started in Mid-Acts, and will end at the rapture. You guys call this TIME PERIOD "the church age".
Why are you guys so embarrassed about your beliefs, and who invented your beliefs?
Yes, Craigie pie, they were fallible men who invented AD 70-ism/Preterism in the 1800's. Weasel boy,you might want to ask yourself why you follow the teachings of these fallible men?
That the Lord Jesus Christ is not a man, today, and that everyone saw an invisible Saviour return in the form of the Roman army, in AD 70, as you won't produce this "everyone," and that the redemption of the body/resurrection no longer applies, as your AD 70-ism/Preterism invention asserts, is a false theory made up by fallible men.
AD 70-ism/Preterism is a false non-Biblical belief system that was made up by fallable men.
Why are you so embarrassed about your beliefs, and who invented your beliefs, these fallable men who invented AD 70-ism/Preterism?
Yes, Craigie pie, they were fallible men who invented AD 70-ism/Preterism in the 1800's. Weasel boy,you might want to ask yourself why you follow the teachings of these fallible men?
More denial on your part.
I'm not embarrassed about my beliefs. You lie about my beliefs.
And, my beliefs cannot be traced to one man like your Dispensationalism can be traced to John Nelson Darby.
No matter how hard you try, you can't show Preterism being invented by one man, nor traced to one man.
Nope. You're willfully reading Ryrie (Acts 2 Dispy) into Acts 9 Dispensationalism once more.
From the Acts 9 Dispy's standpoint, a dispensation is that which is dispensed by a dispensor to a dispensee.
"...the dispensation of the grace of God GIVEN me, to youward."
That it ends up taking a period of time is an aspect of it.
If you and I were neighbors and you were knocking on my door every day, pestering me with your baiting questions in your hope of setting off strife once more, and I finally were to dispense a nice juicy hook kick to your ear; how long it took from the time my foot traveled so enthusiastically to your face to when it did its beautiful damage does not make said travel time the dispensation.
You are just up to more of your hoped for strife via your endless baiting statements and questions. It is what you live for.
HisServant
New member
you also dont seem to understand that the 'dispensation' what a task given to Paul alone for him to teach... its not a system of eschatology or anything else... Paul was given a unique job, and scripture bear that out.
It has nothing to do with end times... old testament times... etc. It was a single thing given to Paul alone to teach us. The 'dispensation' ended when Paul finished his task.
It has nothing to do with end times... old testament times... etc. It was a single thing given to Paul alone to teach us. The 'dispensation' ended when Paul finished his task.
HisServant
New member
Your loss... Satan has your mind closed to the truth.
Yes you are-you are in denial.
No, I don't lie about your beliefs. You are embarrassed by them.
You are in denial.
Neither can ours.
And quite irrelevant.
Yes, Craigie pie, they were fallible men who invented AD 70-ism/Preterism in the 1800's. Weasel boy,you might want to ask yourself why you follow the teachings of these fallible men?
That the Lord Jesus Christ is not a man, today, and that everyone saw an invisible Saviour return in the form of the Roman army, in AD 70, as you won't produce this "everyone," and that the redemption of the body/resurrection no longer applies, as your AD 70-ism/Preterism invention asserts, is a false theory made up by fallible men.
AD 70-ism/Preterism is a false non-Biblical belief system that was made up by fallable men.
Why are you so embarrassed about your beliefs, and who invented your beliefs, these fallable men who invented AD 70-ism/Preterism?
Yes, we can, and have.
You are in denial.
1.No matter how hard you try, you can't show dispensationalism being invented by one man, nor traced to one man.
You are in denial.
2. No matter how hard you try, you can't show that it is relevant as to whether any belief system can be traced to one man. If scripture teaches it, that's all that matters.
3.No matter how hard you try, you can't show that the Reformation is false, as is God the Father, as you claim.
4. No matter how hard you try, you can't show anyone that taught what you "teach," on TOL, before you, these "bunch of men" that you say you can name.
Yep - you've read "Pigs In The Parlor" :chuckle:
Wick Stick
Well-known member
Barnabas is one of my favorites.
I'm of the opinion that this book should be in the Bible.Particularly chapter 2, he appears to say that God did NOT command the sacrifices, or... well... a lot of the stuff in the Pentateuch.
He goes on to say that much of the 'statutes' there are not statutes at all, but rather prophecy, which ought not to be interpreted literally, but instead allegorized and applied to our lives (chapter 9).
So, then, would it be fair to say that Jesus and the disciples taught that the most part of the Law was not meant to be kept literally?
Jarrod
Weasel boy,you might want to ask yourself why you follow the teachings of fallible men.
Why do you follow the teachings of fallable men, Craigie pie?
Yes, D-that is this loser's life-spending most of his waking hours on TOL, quenching his obsession, causing strife, attempting to divide respective members of the boc.
It's quite sad, and pathetic. I pity his "wife" and "children."
Weasel boy,you might want to ask yourself why you follow the teachings of fallible men.
Why do you follow the teachings of fallable men, Craigie pie?
Once again, more evidence of a J Stuart Russell, Hank Hanegraaf Max King, Josephus, Gary Demar, all fallable men, fallable men follower, Craigie pie, living in denial.
Why do you follow the teachings of fallable men, Craigie pie?
Once again, more evidence of a J Stuart Russell, Hank Hanegraaf Max King, Josephus, Gary Demar, all fallable men, fallable men follower, Craigie pie, living in denial.
"And that is what happened. The Lord came in a way that everyone could see Him. However, He never touched planet earth, and when this event was over, He then sat on the throne in Heaven NOT on planet earth.”-Craigie pie the anti semite, Jew hater
Weasel boy,you might want to ask yourself why you follow the teachings of fallible men.
Why do you follow the teachings of fallable men, Craigie pie?
Once again, more evidence of a J Stuart Russell, Hank Hanegraaf Max King, Josephus, Gary Demar, all fallable men, fallable men follower, Craigie pie, living in denial.
Weasel boy,you might want to ask yourself why you follow the teachings of fallible men.
Why do you follow the teachings of fallable men, Craigie pie?
Once again, more evidence of a J Stuart Russell, Hank Hanegraaf Max King, Josephus, Gary Demar, all fallable men, fallable men follower, Craigie pie, living in denial.
- Status