Surely nobody has a say do they?
Only One. [emoji846]
Sent from my iPad using TOL ~Jesus is the Theology and the Counselor is the Commentary
Surely nobody has a say do they?
"2 Sa 12:8 your master’s wives. This phraseology means nothing more than that God in His providence had given David, as king, everything that was Saul’s. There is no evidence that he ever married any of Saul’s wives, though the harem of eastern kings passed to their successors. Ahinoam, the wife of David (2:2; 3:2; 1 Sam. 25:43; 27:3; 30:5), is always referred to as the Jezreelitess, whereas Ahinoam, the wife of Saul, is distinguished clearly from her by being called “the daughter of Ahimaaz” (1 Sam. 14:50)." MacArthur, J., Jr. (Ed.). (1997). The MacArthur Study Bible (electronic ed., p. 443). Nashville, TN: Word Pub.
Keep wondering (Re 22:11).
Keep wondering (Re 22:11).
Do you not know, brothers and sisters—for I am speaking to those who know the law—that the law has authority over someone only as long as that person lives? For example, by law a married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law that binds her to him. So then, if she has sexual relations with another man while her husband is still alive, she is called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is released from that law and is not an adulteress if she marries another man.
Is it true that Paul could not have said this about men? We know that polygyny was common in the OT but I'm not aware of any cases of polyandry.
"2 Sa 5:13 more concubines and wives. The multiplication of David’s wives and concubines was in direct violation of Deut. 17:17. These marriages reflected David’s involvement in international treaties and alliances that were sealed by the marriage of a king’s daughter to the other participants in the treaty. This cultural institution accounted for some of David’s and many of Solomon’s wives (see 1 Kin. 11:1–3). In each case of polygamy in Scripture, the law of God was violated and the consequences were negative, if not disastrous." MacArthur, J., Jr. (Ed.). (1997). The MacArthur Study Bible (electronic ed., p. 434). Nashville, TN: Word Pub.[2 Sa 5:13]
You find this subject unsettling do you not?
It's a big world with all kinds of perverts in it (Ex 20:14). :smokie:
Surely nobody has a say do they?
"2 Sa 5:13 more concubines and wives. The multiplication of David’s wives and concubines was in direct violation of Deut. 17:17. These marriages reflected David’s involvement in international treaties and alliances that were sealed by the marriage of a king’s daughter to the other participants in the treaty. This cultural institution accounted for some of David’s and many of Solomon’s wives (see 1 Kin. 11:1–3). In each case of polygamy in Scripture, the law of God was violated and the consequences were negative, if not disastrous." MacArthur, J., Jr. (Ed.). (1997). The MacArthur Study Bible (electronic ed., p. 434). Nashville, TN: Word Pub.
And David took him more concubines and wives out of Jerusalem, after he was come from Hebron: and there were yet sons and daughters born to David [2 Sam. 5:13].
"That is the record of the facts. God did not put His stamp of approval upon what David did. We will find that God definitely disapproves of polygamy. In David’s son Solomon it resulted in the splitting of the kingdom and finally brought on the Babylonian captivity. Why? Because David and Solomon were kings and in places of leadership. Their actions were wrong. Who says they were wrong? God says they were wrong! After all, it is His universe, and He makes the rules. Although you may not like them, God’s rules are good. God not only created us, but He laid down rules and regulations for our lives which would bring to the human family the ultimate in happiness and blessing." McGee, J. V. (1997). Thru the Bible commentary (electronic ed., Vol. 2, p. 197). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
[Ex 20:14] Now why would this be relevant?
It comes down to one simple idea.
The God of the Hebrew Scriptures Exalts Mercy over Sacrifice.
Mt. 9:13
Go and learn what this means: I desire mercy and not sacrifice. For I didn't come to call the righteous, but sinners."
Hosea 6:6
For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.
1st John 4
The one who does not love does not know God, because God is love.
John 3:17
17 For God did not send His Son into the world that He might condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.
~~~~~ Jesus makes the claim to be the person of YHWH in Flesh amongst us as the Son of God and Son of Man.
John 5:39
You pore over the Scriptures because you think you have eternal life in them, yet they testify about Me.
John 8:58
Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, before Abraham was even born, I Am!"
John 14:9
Jesus answered: "Don't you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father'?
............... Paul and John state that Love is God and God is Love. This identifies the character of God and our calling to Love as His Sheep.
...... God rules with compassion and Mercy, while needy Creation rules with Selfishness and condemnation.
....... Man and Corrupted Angels seek to undermine the authority and Character of God by replacing God's work with their own.
........ Do we trust that the 66 book bible can be read as moral law that demands our work? Or, do we admit that God is Loving and only He can accomplish the needs of the soul.
We either put our hope, faith and Love into the works of our hands, or the work of God.
If this is understood, doubt rolls away like a stone from a tomb and let's our soul free.
Jesus is our heart and soul, and we are incomplete without Him.
This is the basic principle that the Dragon has been combatting since Eden.
Do we struggle to be like God, or do we Trust that He alone knows best and Is the personification of Mercy, Love and Humility?
What is your mind on this?
Sent from my iPad using TOL ~Jesus is the Theology and the Counselor is the Commentary
I am perplexed by your post NIG. To reach the point of trust then, presumably, scripture should 'add up'.
All I seem to see from Christians is division and contention.
MAybe I should lay off this because I just seem to be adding to the problem.
Again...why would an agnostic care what the Bible says? You said yesterday you don't believe it.
You don't have an intellectual problem. You have a heart problem. Clearly, you are not interested in holiness.Such scriptures as these (and others) are the foundation of my doubt.
I am perplexed by your post NIG. To reach the point of trust then, presumably, scripture should 'add up'.
All I seem to see from Christians is division and contention.
MAybe I should lay off this because I just seem to be adding to the problem.
I am perplexed by your post NIG. To reach the point of trust then, presumably, scripture should 'add up'.
All I seem to see from Christians is division and contention.
MAybe I should lay off this because I just seem to be adding to the problem.
You don't have an intellectual problem. You have a heart problem. Clearly, you are not interested in holiness.
Beware, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief in departing from the living God; but exhort one another daily, while it is called “Today,” lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin (Heb 3:12–13).
I am perplexed by your post NIG. To reach the point of trust then, presumably, scripture should 'add up'.
All I seem to see from Christians is division and contention.
MAybe I should lay off this because I just seem to be adding to the problem.