:mock: Booduh
.
:mock: Booduh
(emphasis added)
Okay, hold on. You haven't been treated so obnoxiously by someone pitching their religion that it made you angry in years...and yet you're comfortable assuming that anyone speaking angrily about Christians proselytizing must have had a similar experience?
I would assume the person is probably angry for some other reason
, as my (your) experience indicates to me (you) that it happens very rarely. So why this assumption that's so contrary to your own experience?
Here's what I see. And forgive me if I'm repetitive as I've not read every single reply.
The message of the Buddha is universal. When you hear it, really listening, you think to yoursef "of course". It's so very simple like something you knew but forgot. It's not objectionable because it doesn't target certain groups as "sinful" or unworthy of unconditional love. Everyone is included. It's not in opposition to nature - it IS nature. It is the innate wisdom available to all man/womankind.
Jesus's message is not actually what Bob is speaking of. What makes people angry is Christian dogma, doctrine and exclusivity. The actual idea that creator is angry at his creation for being what he created doesn't make sense. Nor does it make sense that this creator would require someone to be tortured and die so that he can forgive us for being as he made us.
So yes the typical Christian message makes most sane people angry because they have not been conditioned to live in opposite world where many Christians reside.
Any suggestions on how to share the Good News with others less obnoxiously? Bearing in mind what Christians believe, of course. That this Good News can bring one into a personal and eternal relationship with God Himself and save one from hell as well.
I don't think it's irrelevant. I think it's the most important thing about you.
You don't have to be a perverted freak, you know?
Knowing that is working for me. :up:
More Christian pastors have been perverted freaks than idle atheists.
More Christian pastors have been perverted freaks than idle atheists.
More Christian pastors have been perverted freaks than idle atheists.
Probably because it's statistically unlikely and a generalization based on anecdotal evidence. Otherwise, it's just peachy. lain:Well yeah, but that really annoys people when you mention that here.
Well yeah, but that really annoys people when you mention that here.
And Stripe is starting to give me the impression that he obsesses at least a little over what he considers to be my perversion. Which is kinda creepy.
That depends on who's agenda those lies support.Yeah, lies are generally frowned upon around here. :up:
You think attention from a boy might be creepy!? :shocked:
Maybe there is hope for you... :think:
:nono:That depends on who's agenda those lies support.
I just find you creepy.
Jesus's message is not actually what Bob is speaking of. What makes people angry is Christian dogma, doctrine and exclusivity. The actual idea that creator is angry at his creation for being what he created doesn't make sense. Nor does it make sense that this creator would require someone to be tortured and die so that he can forgive us for being as he made us.
So yes the typical Christian message makes most sane people angry because they have not been conditioned to live in opposite world where many Christians reside.
the same thing happens when you talk about the Catholic Church
Does Everyone Agree with Bob?
This is the show from Tuesday July 28th, 2009.
BEST QUOTE OF THE SHOW:
/QUOTE]If you tell [people] about Buddha they don't get upset. If you tell them about Jesus Christ they get angry. So that's a sign to us, that's a clue that Christianity is true and Buddhism is false.
People who claim the Holocaust never happened make people angry. Is that a clue that Holocaust revisionism might be true?
...or try to promote NAMBLA.
How can you see a conflict between the ideas that God created us to be as we are and God being angry with us for being as we are and not consider maybe, perhaps, possibly one of those two points is wrong?The actual idea that creator is angry at his creation for being what he created doesn't make sense. Nor does it make sense that this creator would require someone to be tortured and die so that he can forgive us for being as he made us.
Lots of reasons. :idunno:Why else would anyone speak angrily about christians proselytizing, or for that matter, anyone?
Try to keep up with the conversation, if you're going to inject your opinion into it.That's simple MC, you would, you are one of them!
Again, try to keep up with the convo or go sit at the kiddie table. This doesn't address why one who'd experience behavior tempting him to anger from a certain group only one time in years would assume that to be the norm for everyone else.If rarely creates anger, then often would produce rage. Its a good thing he experienced it rarely!
How can you see a conflict between the ideas that God created us to be as we are and God being angry with us for being as we are and not consider maybe, perhaps, possibly one of those two points is wrong?
It honestly hasn't ever occurred to you that there's conflict between these two ideas because one was wrong? You haven't seen these two points addressed time and again around here?
Really. I doubt that. I flatly doubt this hasn't occurred to you. And even failing that, that you've never encountered anything that made more sense than this. Good grief, one of the main reasons we experience incredulity in the first place is so that we can reexamine whatever has caused it.