That's what I'm wondering. Deny it though they will, works in Acts 2 disp'ism is not a bug, it's a feature.
It is why so many Acts 2 Dispys have ended up either in the error that is Progressive Dispensationalism and or in that other new error - New Covenant Theology.
Though Darby, et al had made "great strides in Dispensationalism" theirs had largely still remained a mix of Reformed and Acts 2 Dispensationalism.
The Lordship first..the resulting confusion.
Sort of like how some Roman Catholics and even supposed "Protestants" end up JWs, Mormons, Muslim, etc - the error that such have the works treadmill down just a bit better.