I note that you chose not to address my hypothetical situation. Why? If you know that a woman will get an abortion if she gets pregnant, are you guilty of murder if you do not do everything you can to prevent her from getting pregnant up to and including providing birth control?
We should not do evil that good may come of it. That includes breaking God's command to be fruitful and multiply.
Why aren't you guilty. You didn't do everything you could do to prevent an abortion. You are guilty of exactly the same thing you are accusing McCain of. I find your argument hypocritical.
The only thing he said was that he wold not do everything to prevent her from getting pregnant. He never said he would not do everything to prevent her from getting an abortion. There is a difference you know.
I did not say the children under Pharoh was a punishment on the Israelites.
I said it was to show the power of God.
My point was that God raises up rulers for different reasons, including punishment, fulfillment of prophecy, and to show His power.
Romans 9:17
For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. |
You should have used Exodus 9:16.
But you're missing something. You're missing the fact that God did not put the Israelites under Pharaoh. And you're missing that God was not responsible for Egypt's governmental system. And what He told Moses to say was in regard to Egypt as a whole, not just Pharaoh. Also, it was in contrast to what He could have done [pestilence]. Instead of destroying them for their evil toward the Israelites He raised them up to show His power.
The only way you could argue otherwise is if you wanted to somehow argue that Obama is not dramatically worse than McCain on every single issue, including abortion.
I can assure you that Obama is not worse on the issue of abortion than McCain is. Because no matter what McCain says, he's not going to change a thing. Nor will he appoint Justices to the Supreme Court that will change anything.:nono:
I'm just curious (this is way out of the scope of the debate), which is worse: killing a baby (in the womb or out) or denying God access to the womb to create a child (denying existence of any kind whatever to a child that God desires to create)?
Neither is worse.
But you have to prove that God actually desires to create a specific child.
I, for one, believe that God desires that children are conceived and born. But I do not believe that He actually goes in and creates children. He designed humans to create children on their own, in the way that we do.
But I can agree that once a child is conceived, then God may go in and form the inward parts. David believed it. And it is in the Bible. So I have no reason to disagree.
But I do not believe God makes children have disabilities, or such.
You are missing logic and reason
We do not vote for McCain, we vote republican because they do not block the
confirmation of conservative judges
Can you tell the difference between a conservative judge and a liberal one?
Liberal judges call themselves Republicans or Democrats.
How can you say they answered yes without exception when their exception is clearly stated?
Translation: :dunce::duh:
1)None of the candidates has ever advocated killing children.
Untrue.
Obama specifically stated that he advocates abortion. He even said that if either of his daughters became pregnant before they were ready to raise a child that he would want them to have an abortion. I can find some video of it if you want.
2 and 3)If it is moral for a person to not prevent the conception of a baby that will be aborted by teaching methods of contraception, then it is equally moral to vote for a candidate who opposes abortion on a personal level but will allow women to decide if abortion is right for them.
You're a moron.
Two wrongs have never made a right. Ever.
And there is also no possible way you can know that a person will certainly have an abortion. They may say they will have one if they get pregnant. But instead of preventing them from getting pregnant you should instead reason with them to not get an abortion.
And if they are fornicating you should attempt to reason with them not to fornicate. But that will be harder than reasoning with them to not get an abortion in today's society.
Of course, that doesn't mean you shouldn't try.
Since the debate is specifically directed towards discussing McCain, any comments or questions raised during the debate can reasonable be inferred to be about McCain. At the very least, the questions were intended to lay a foundation from which you could assail the other side for being hypocrites./quote]
You're a moron.
The questions were intended to lay a foundation from which they could reason with the other side and prove that McCain falls under at least one of those three categories, if not more than one.
And the only side, as far as I have seen, to call their opponents hypocrites is NW in reference to GG. And it has happened at least two or three times that I have read.
