Obama cannot commit such evil acts unless people grant him the authority and power to do so. If nobody votes for him at all, he's just a regular "Joe Four-Pack" (of wine coolers, that is) not much different from you and me. But, if given power and authority by voters, he will exercise that power to destructive ends. And everyone who voted for him will share culpability in what he uses that power for.I see that you've replied again, but I only have time at the moment to post a quick comment in reply to something you said in the debate, answering a question about the definition of "voting":
I agree with that statement. However, I do not agree that it is immoral to vote for a person who is unfit for office.
That is because of the way I defined a vote: "I prefer the results of this action to the results of my other options."
Note: I am also implicitly assuming that this vote is not an act of participation in the policies that the candidate enacts. If I became persuaded otherwise on that point, I would change my view about the morality of voting for an unfit candidate. Because then it would be a matter of committing an evil act in order to achieve a well-intentioned end.
Likewise with McCain. If you were to vote for McCain and I vote for Alan Keyes, and McCain is elected, the people who grant him the power and authority to kill the unborn will be the ones who are morally responsible for those murders.
If you knowingly hire an unrepentant thief to run the register in your store, you are co-responsible for those thefts. If you knowingly hire an unrepentant child molester to babysit someone's children, are you not co-responsible if those children are harmed? Of course you are.
If you knowingly hire an unrepentant murderer as the top law enforcement official and commander in chief of the United States, the chief executive in charge of protecting the life and liberty of all Americans..... then you are co-responsible.
So, I ask you -- If you knowingly hire an unrepentant child molester to babysit someone's children, are you not co-responsible if those children are harmed?