No, it's actually a fact.
The odds are zero.
There is not a single scientific fact that supports the idea of life from non-life based on natural processes.
Nope. There's no reason to suspect that we cannot synthesize all the biochemicals needed to make a soup that can generate fresh life. Once you have all the right chemicals in the right proportion all you need to do is build a structure. You're going to build dozens of structures, and they are all functioning, but this isn't going to function due to the application of force, which is what we'd expect, or heat, or some other physical impression that we can make on the chemicals. I will come from the biochemicals themselves. They're like computer code and operating systems and firmware and apps. Although this sounds very complex and complicated not to worry, because the language used only uses four letters, which means it's no more than eight times as complex as a binary language like computers, and we all know the limitations of what you can program a computer to do. Once we know the code, we can definitely synthesize the molecules, we just have to build the structures required to make life with all the right molecules we synthesized, and then the molecules themselves will direct the structure that we have to make after that, because of the code we 'built' into the organic synthesis of the chemicals, that are used to build the structures that we need to make life. If that is what you call "zero" odds then you're categorically incorrect. It's logically possible, it's just 'basically impossible' that anything like this could ever happen, for real. It'd be far more likely to flick a deck of cards onto the floor and that it assembled into a house, than that abiogenesis occurred, but that doesn't make it literally impossible, logically impossible.
