You prove you cannot defend your doctrines. You do not have truth so your resort to lies and insults.It is troubling to hear that someone does not know what the Word of God says.
How is it you do not know?
This is fun.
You prove you cannot defend your doctrines. You do not have truth so your resort to lies and insults.It is troubling to hear that someone does not know what the Word of God says.
How is it you do not know?
You are a Seventh day adventist are you not?
No Paul did not teach obedience to the law, he vehemently opposed obedience to the law for the Gentiles.
He rebuked Peter and called a council of the WHOLE church, all the apostles and all the prophets were there and we have a record of what they and the Holy Spirit decided.
We are to abstain from fornication and blood and that only out of respect for the Jews
If we do that we shall do well.
You are right Linnet. Paul could never have taught obedience because he would have been contradicting himself. Obedience implies the Law; otherwise, to teach obedience to what if not to the Law? And Paul could not have taught obedience because he used to teach that Christians had been delivered from the Law as we read in Romans 7:6. And that Jesus himself had abolished the Law on the cross. (Ephesians 2:15) He also used to teach that Jesus had been the end of the Law. (Romans 10:4) So, why would he preach repentance if the Law no longer existed?
It is troubling to hear that someone does not know what the Word of God says.
How is it you do not know?
I believe Paul kept the Law and wanted Gentiles to obey God in faith.
You are right Linnet. Paul could never have taught obedience because he would have been contradicting himself. Obedience implies the Law; otherwise, to teach obedience to what if not to the Law? And Paul could not have taught obedience because he used to teach that Christians had been delivered from the Law as we read in Romans 7:6. And that Jesus himself had abolished the Law on the cross. (Ephesians 2:15) He also used to teach that Jesus had been the end of the Law. (Romans 10:4) So, why would he preach repentance if the Law no longer existed?
Don't be stupid.
I wasn't asking what the Bible says, I was asking Jacob to uncover his thinly failed legalism.
Of course, you knew that when you made this idiotic accusation. How is it that you don't know what the word of God says about lying? Troubling!
It's a matter of law vs. Spirit. We can not obey the law in our own ability,
Why do you keep repeating that lie?