Cruciform
New member
Straw man Fallacy. The Catholic Church has never claimed any such thing, and nor have I. Get your facts straight.Yet, the RCC would have you believe that THE Church was founded in Rome in the first century...
Straw man Fallacy. The Catholic Church has never claimed any such thing, and nor have I. Get your facts straight.Yet, the RCC would have you believe that THE Church was founded in Rome in the first century...
Oops! See Post #101 above.Wow. Excellent point. I love it.
Rather, an entirely accurate and compelling counterargument---unless you in fact CAN demonstrate that your favored recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect IS actually that one historic church founded by Jesus Christ himself in 33 A.D... No? Didn't think so. My prior statement, therefore, stands exactly as posted.In other words, you can't think of a more worthless rebuttal. :duh:
No, it doesn't. The messiah did not start a synagogue, and he would have merely started a new form of Israelite religion. Tradition was always a written thing with the Israelites. Your recent oral traditions are false, weak, and don't persuade.Rather, an entirely accurate and compelling counterargument---unless you in fact CAN demonstrate that your favored recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect IS actually that one historic church founded by Jesus Christ himself in 33 A.D... No? Didn't think so. My prior statement, therefore, stands exactly as posted.
Rather, an entirely accurate and compelling counterargument---unless you in fact CAN demonstrate that your favored recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect IS actually that one historic church founded by Jesus Christ himself in 33 A.D... No? Didn't think so. My prior statement, therefore, stands exactly as posted.
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
Your church was founded in 1054 or 314.. dependng on ones view of history... so your statement was laughable.
Mostly the Orthodox Churches.... Roman Catholics were the minority... It was even presided over by a bishop from the west
1000 from the east
and
800 from the west
it was a long trip from the west
but
you were suggesting there was no church before constantine
Your church was founded in 1054 or 314.. dependng on ones view of history... so your statement was laughable.
Jesus most certainly did not found Roman Catholicism in 33 AD... so you lose.
It was Romans that killed him... Romans that are under a curse for all eternity.... you are cursed... its obvious to everyone.
I'm suggesting that the eastern orthodox churches are the churches that Jesus and the Apostles started.... Rome has no claim to primacy or even being an apostolic church.
Your church started when it decided to break off from it.
WHY DO YOU CATHOLICS KEEP TRYING TO PUSH THIS STUFF ON REAL CHRISTIANS ?:duh:
IT IS JUST A PICTURE OF SOME OLD GUY IN A RED DRESS.each:each:each:each:
So what, who is he and why should we listen to him.:nono::nono:
do you forget your posts that easy?
Nope... my posts are consistent.
including peter in babylon?
Yup.. that is where he went.
do you realize what that does to your credibility?
Why should stating a fact hurt my credibility?
I'm suggesting that the eastern orthodox churches are the churches that Jesus and the Apostles started.... Rome has no claim to primacy or even being an apostolic church.
Your church started when it decided to break off from it.
They were all one church for at least 1000 years. Rome is certainly apostolic.