Sure you did. Not directly. That's not what you do. No what you do, when someone is talking about movies, is mention you thought one of the stars was gay. Then when you're told that's an invention and nearly out of the blue you write:There you go again. I never called you queer
"Yeah, so you like queer men. I get that. I don't."
Not actors, men. Not quite clever enough, but then you never really are. And so a mod put you in the penalty box.
Later you'd come back to say you didn't know anything about the homosexual rumor until after your banning, which was of course laughably untrue as you noted the rumor prior to the shot that landed you in TOL jail.
And that's you all over.
Another reinvention stab. Won't wash. Here's the link if anyone happens across this and is interested: http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=84043though you took my sarcasm about liking Grant and others as such and were successful in selling the ruse.
I wasn't speaking about Jack. I was thinking about how you tried numerous times to shame me over my wife working and my being home with Jack. You tried to use Jack too and kept at it after I asked you to stop.I have always thought Jack a wonderful blessing but I stand by the assessment that it was a goofy hat. But I stopped making any comments about your family because you asked me to stop.
I think that happened while I had you on ban for a while.Did you even notice?
Said the woman who is trying little else here. No, I'm good at remembering and pointing out the factual. When dealing with people who are essentially dishonest it's a handy knack.You are good, maybe even the best, at placing others on defense.