CherubRam
New member
Um.....what? This is "Ida" (Darwinius)...
So if H. naledi is "more ape" than Darwinius, I guess that means humans are "more ape" than Darwinius too. :chuckle:
I have seen people alive today that look like this above picture.
Creationists stumped by new hominid fossils
- Thread starter Jose Fly
- Start date
I have seen people alive today that look like this above picture.
Right Divider
Body part
The one on the left or the one on the right?
CherubRam
New member
The left.
CherubRam
New member
The Dead Sea Scrolls say that Noah was the first white man born, and that he had blue eyes. Before then, people only had brown eyes. I think Evolutionist do not like the fact that white men came from the darker skinned peoples.
:AMR1: pffft....sez you!
Interplanner
Well-known member
So when the eco-socialists take away your property because there are humans ("great apes") that deserve as much as you have, and you are in the top 1% so you're the first target of these environmental justice crusaders, will you say you are "human"?
That sounds like a bizarre scenario, but I am in favour of the principle of redistributing wealth so people aren't left destitute.
I also try to shop in a way that supports suppliers who aren't destroying the habitats of the other great apes, and I hope you do the same.
Stuart
What, you mean like the way creationists don't like the fact that they are descended from early monkey species?
I haven't seen you write anything so obviously ridiculous in a long time.
And that's really saying something.
Stuart
alwight
New member
:rotfl:
CherubRam
New member
CHAPTER CVI.
1. And after some days my son Methuselah took a wife for his son Lamech, and she became pregnant by him and bore a son. 2. And his body was white as snow and red as the blooming of a rose, and the hair of his head †and his long locks were white as wool, and his eyes beautiful†. And when he opened his eyes, he lighted up the whole house like the sun, and the whole house was very bright. 3. And thereupon he arose in the hands of the midwife, opened his mouth, and †conversed with† the Lord of righteousness. 4. And his father Lamech was afraid of him and fled, and came to his father Methuselah. 5. And he said unto him: 'I have begotten a strange son, diverse from and unlike man, and resembling the sons of the God of heaven; and his nature is different and he is not like us, and his eyes are as the rays of the sun, and his countenance is glorious. 6. And it seems to me that he is not sprung from me but from the angels, and I fear that in his days a wonder may be wrought on the earth. 7. And now, my father, I am here to petition thee and implore thee that thou mayest go to Enoch, our father, and learn from him the truth, for his dwelling-place is amongst the angels.' 8. And when Methuselah heard the words of his son, he came to me to the ends of the earth; for he had heard that I was there, and he cried aloud, and I heard his voice and I came to him. And 1 said unto him: 'Behold, here am I, my son, wherefore hast thou come to me?' 9. And he answered and said: 'Because of a great cause of anxiety have I come to thee, and because of a disturbing vision have I approached. 10. And now, my father, hear me: unto Lamech my son there hath been born a son, the like of whom there is none, and his nature is not like man's nature, and the colour of his body is whiter than snow and redder than the bloom of a rose, and the hair of his head is whiter than white wool, and his eyes are like the rays of the sun, and he opened his eyes and thereupon lighted up the whole house.
Jose Fly
New member
No doubt. What in the world was that? :idunno:
Jose Fly
New member
And that is more of an ape than H. naledi?
6days
New member
I'm not sure if you intentionally misrepresent what others such such as in the OP... intentionally misrepresent whatever I said? Or, if in your zeal you don't read carefully enough.
But.... you have it backwards from what I said...naledi is more apelike than Ida, who evolutionists promoted as a missing link.
Jose Fly
New member
6days
New member
I don't know what naledi is. If I was to guess, I suppose an extinct ape, based on small brain, but.... I don't know. My position though is the same as it would be for Neandertals after initial discovery.... It is either fully human....or dully animal. There is no such thing as a transition between ape and human.
Jose Fly
New member
Wouldn't you think that if there was absolutely no connection between humans and other primates, there would be a very clear and distinct line between the two, and specimens like this would never exist? Every specimen would be trivially easy to put in the "human" or "ape" group.
Why is God so good to evolutionary scientists and so mean to creationists?
Interplanner
Well-known member
I'll give gifts to whom I want; I will never let a spastic like Obama or Kerry or Clinton have it if I can help it.
Right Divider
Body part
Nice assumption.
Interplanner
Well-known member
There are at least two chapters in Ross CREATION AND TIME documenting the leap in capabilities between previous hominids and mankind. Which is what he believes the creation of man is referring to and verified by. It does not come down to bones. It comes down to activities, abstract thought (and some of that is intended to be evil), useful memory (history), etc.