Great! :thumb:
Show us your evidence that oblivion is all that awaits us.
First show me where I made that claim? But if you think something happens after death then the burdon of proof rests with you.
What's the difference without evidence?
We hope that our life has meaning and that the things we do, the relationships we build and the ideas we bring forth have meaning and context, rather than all being destined for nothingness.
Good for you, but genuine evidence for life after death would be better.
Let's be honest, in a debate over oblivion or hope, hope is the only possibly useful course.
Have at it then, but without evidence it just wishful thinking.
We hope there is justice and mercy; that those who have had things all their own way and used their position to kill and destroy will face justice, while those who have sacrificed for the benefit of others will see their reward.
What, after death? There's no evidence dude, snap out of it!
Hope is a good thing; perhaps the best of things.
Sure, but blind without evidence.
It's not an active belief as such, more that there is no evidence for life after death. Unless of course you have the evidence...... got any?
Ah, the old argument from silence. We prefer a rational argument. Show us your evidence that oblivion is all that awaits.
Sure, as soon as you show me where I have made that claim. All I have said is that there is no evidence for life after death. I know you are desperate to switch the burden of proof but you are the one who claims (even if it's just blind hope) life after death, so the burden is yours. Present the evidence and we can all go home.
Well, if I'm wrong, at least I won't have to put up with you gloating.
As far as I know you might not be wrong. You just can't demonstrate any truth to it. And that's all there is to it.
What can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence - Christopher Hitchens