1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
All that was, is a theory to try and bolster the idea that there was a miocene era.
Creation vs. Evolution II
- Thread starter patrick jane
- Start date
All that was, is a theory to try and bolster the idea that there was a miocene era.
Dear Stuu,
No, a Disunited States is not greater than a United States. God is not silent to those who love and Follow Him!!
Many Good Wishes!
Michael
Dear Hedshaker,
I do not have a Dunning Kruger Effect. I don't think that I'm smarter than everyone else, of course not. You just don't realize where I get my information from. That's what you have a problem with. God gives me the words to write back to you and everyone else. So it is not me who thinks I'm smarter than everyone else. You just don't understand. I've gone through a lot and have learned many things and secrets that are just not revealed to you yet. There is a fourth dimension that you as yet know nothing about. Otherwise, you would be able to see God's face and other things. You're on your way to a better place if you'd just keep on trying. It is a wonderful investment to make for your eternal life. Please, hedshaker.
God's Best 4 U,
Michael
Trying To Understand You,
Michael
Dear musterion,
You nailed it!! Thanks for your reply in my defense. People are always trying to trample over me and 6days just because we're trying to help them.
God Bless You And Your Loved Ones,
Michael
Dear Hedshaker,
I watched part of your video and didn't agree that it has anything to do with me, but maybe you. You just don't know what God's doing in the Earth right now. Something He has promised us for a LONG TIME. You will be left behind and you don't seem to care about it. If you realized your end result, you would have changed by now. But you don't seem to care, so enjoy the fire's heat.
Michael
I guess there can't have been a Miocene Era up there in good 'ol Missouri.
We had one down here where I live though.
Stuart
This is sort of how the Bible books were written, people like Michael taking themselves too seriously, thinking they were writing Gods words.
6days
New member
Michael... Your statement that God can do anything is not quite correct.
Here are some things God can not do.....
1. He cannot die, nor can Jesus die again (Deut 32:39-40 /Rom. 6:9-10
2. God cannot lie (Heb. 6:18).
3. God can't be illogical . He can't draw a round square. (Matt. 19:26 / James 1:13}
4. God cannot stop being God (Mal. 3:6).
5. God can't learn new things. He already is all knowing (Psa. 139:1-4)
6. God cannot be fooled (Num 32:23).
7. God can't accept less than your whole heart (Deut. 6:5).
These are a few of the things God can't do. However He can do everything that is within His nature. He can't do things outside of His nature...or, He would not be God.
Greg Jennings
New member
That would work if the oceans were static. The geologic record shows that there have been many periods of ocean transgressions and regressions. That would severely impact the model Mr. Newton proposed. He was brilliant, but as we both know he was mistake prone (as were many scientists of the time, as they did not have access to info and data that we do now)
Greg Jennings
New member
Says the guy talking about "sticking things up butts" in a thread about evolution vs creationism
6days
New member
One thing we agree on..... The present is NOT the key to the past. (Also... It was not a model proposed by Newton)
So how do we start to understand the past?
6days
New member
I would suggest you start with the Gospel of John.
Greg Jennings
New member
Ahhh yes.....employing the scientific method well, 6. Not to mention that John was created FROM Matthew and Mark, so those two would be your primary sources. It would never be John or Luke
This is why no scientist takes you seriously. You pretend to be interested in research and data, then you spit out that nothing matters except an old book. Either get serious about your science, or leave it be
musterion
Well-known member
Don't overcomplicate it. It could not be more simple.
Sex organs are for sex.
Oral and anal cavities are not sex organs.
That's how it is, stupid pervert.
Hedshaker
New member
It's your phony belief Michael, so you go to hell!!!!!!
Michael, I am sure the overwhelming majority of readers knew what I was getting at with my mention of a “rock so big He can’t pick it up”. But in your case, I suspect a careful and forthright explanation may be futile, so I will forbear. I will just note that in another post even 6days cautioned you against the “God can do anything” type of claim, so I will let that suffice.
But your question was whether or not I missed out on it. I also think I missed out on enjoying a camel steak dinner with Moses and the Pharaoh.
Will a fireproof suit help me, or a suit of armor?
That’s fine too, but I sure don’t see that as being much different than what I said.
Then we will count on you keeping us on track in those fields too, especially the part of biology where it explains how you descended from a shrew.
Several times I have recommended you excuse yourself from getting into my discussions. You are the one that keeps making the choice to jump into them.
Wrong? You mean kinda like in school, where you often flail a bit before you finally figure out exactly what the teacher is trying to convey? Except in science, initially there isn’t even a teacher, just a bunch of students having to root out the information themselves, and then even writing the textbook themselves. Often been wrong – yup. But in the end, the textbook gets written, cutting through all the pain and agony, so someone can actually take on the task of teacher for the next generation of scientists.
Observing secular science make mistakes doesn’t bother me much at all, cause after a while I see that real visible progress has been made. Now Genesis science, predicated on the idea that no error can be admitted, so you are obligated to defend silly iron-age science - now that is a sad commentary on human unwillingness to learn.
That ragtag collection of nomadic religious accounts that you euphemistically call “God’s Word” stands forever only in the fanatical unthinking devotion it receives from your types. It’s pretty much on the “not worth bothering with” shelf in most scientific institutions.
As I have pointed out before, for a couple of millennia when religion had the playing field all to itself, and science wasn’t even a contender, human progress was essentially stagnant. But in my lifetime, science has added far more new knowledge than all religions in all of recorded history. So there is already an extended clear precedent for showing that having a “divine foot in the door” is far more a detriment than an advantage.
A couple of years before his death, I attended a lecture given by Carl Sagan. After his prepared remarks, during the Q&A, a fundamentalist Christian berated Carl for his lack of belief. Carl politely heard him out, and then responded by summarizing the creation account as recorded in Genesis, and then he summarized a couple of other creation accounts from other non-Christian religions. Finally he simply pointed out that the non-Christian accounts dovetailed much more closely with what science has found than did the Genesis one. So if I take your advice, I should go back and dig out the info from that presentation, and follow the evidence into some religion far afield from Christianity.
And in so doing, modern science found that much of the Genesis story was apocryphal. Don’t ya hate it when things go exactly opposite to what you expect?
Except when your nomadic creation tale makes a mockery of well-established science, then it makes some real doozers, like Cadry-level “rapture will be in 2015” type errors.
On the age of the earth, the Christian Lord Kelvin (of the Second Law of Thermodynamics fame) left a legacy of defending an age of the earth more than a thousand times as long as you believe in. I kinda thought he was not a fan of Darwin, but if you say he was in fact a closet evolutionist – glad to know it.
In Lord Kelvin’s case, he was wrong – but not in your favor. Radioactivity was too new a subject for him to know that it was a significant player in the earth’s internal heat budget. Had he understood that, he probably would have upped his calculated age of the earth to about – say – 4.5 billion years, just like Snelling confirmed.
Last edited: