Could Dogs detect Covid-19?

[Arthur Brain]

LOL @ you lying, Nazi leftard fool, Arthur Brain. You show how abjectly stupid you are, here, by mistaking those of your fellow Nazi leftards who are Democrat governors of several U.S. states as being "your president who's the head of a republican administration."

Hmm, who was it who publicly declared a national emergency?

LOL @ "dude!"

Yeah, man....surfs up, dude! Gnarly, bro! Like hang ten, dude! Totally rad!

Yeah, doofus would have been more apt.

The best you, personally, can hope to do with TOL toward satisfying your desire for me, and other enemies of your irrational worldview, to be censored/silenced, is to simply continue to lie about us--about what we say/believe. You're a hardened liar--of course you would love for me to be silenced.

No, I really wouldn't. You're kinda hilarious in a bizarre sorta way and I don't want you to be silenced at all. Does that bother you?

Then why do you continually lie about those of us who confront your falsehoods and nonsense with truth and logic? Not only that, but you continually lie about yourself--about the falsehood and stupidities you froth up on TOL. You lie, for instance, by saying that you're "engaging" with what we say, when, in truth, what you're actually doing is reacting irrationally, angrily to what we say, rather than engaging with it. You habitually, persistently stonewall against the questions we ask you, and then lie about your stonewalling, by saying that you have answered those questions, despite the manifest fact that you've done nothing but try to run away from those questions. Your blatant dishonesty--your shameless practice of bearing false witness against your opponents--is the boldest manifestation of your desire for us to be silenced that is possible to be achieved through means of TOL, so you have to bite the bullet, make do with that, and continue lying by saying you don't want us silenced.

I have to give you some sort of kudos for not falling asleep while typing that whole load of prattle. "Bearing false witness"? That would be the likes of you who call people "Nazi leftards" and insisting that anyone with opposing views want you censored and the like. Entertaining as all get out though.

LOL

Let's see, now.....which one of us two has set the other one of us two on "Ignore"? It's not me: I've never set anybody on TOL on "Ignore", nor even been inclined to do so. You, on the other hand, so far as I can tell, have had me set on "Ignore" for many months. Yeah, you're all about not plugging your ears, ain't ya!

Uh, if you were on my ignore list then I wouldn't be responding to you, dingbat. Again, entertainment value alone....

Also, I love how you, out of one side of your mouth, say, "I don't want people silenced, at all", and then turn right around and admit that you try to get certain people silenced. You're so hardened and shameless in your lying that you don't even blush with embarrassment at your glaring self-contradictions; in this way, you're kind of like old people who fart or belch loudly in public and don't look the least embarrassed. Yet, they can't help that, and it's excusable, understandable, and morally neutral, whereas you could help lying, but you don't do so; you habitually choose to lie on TOL.

Um, no, I admitted to a handful of reports in 14 years on here that had nothing to do with wanting people silenced but kicked into touch for inappropriate behaviour.

Nobody has a right to be wrong, nor to bear false witness. You're wrong about most everything, but you've no right to be so. So, I'm not on the same page with you and your fellow shallows, Nazi leftards and Voltaire cheerleaders, when you say stupidities like, "I respect your right to think wrongly."

Sure they do as you've more than "capably" evidenced with this reply alone. This is hysterical...

You fully support my freedom of speech? Is your having set me on "Ignore" what you call "fully supporting" my "freedom of speech"? LOLOL

Surfs up, dude!:surf:

You don't even understand how the ignore function works on here do you? That's funny in itself but even if I did have you on ignore it wouldn't in any way encumber your freedom of speech, it would just allow me the pleasure of not seeing your posts.

Do some homework doofus.

 

[eider]

Yeah, I've called Arthur Brain a Nazi leftard,

Arthur Brain is a Nazi leftard,

Arthur Brain has already replied to your comments, above.

The Constitution of the United States of America rules my country.

Where did you go to school? What qualifications did you gain?
I thought your Constitution was all about government of, for and by the people?

 

[ok doser]

 

[ok doser]

 

[7djengo7]

Hmm, who was it who publicly declared a national emergency?

What (if anything) do you imagine that has to do with anything that I've written? That's right! It has nothing to do with anything I've written. As usual, you endeavor to shift attention away from the subject, because you've got no argument.

​

Yeah, doofus would have been more apt.

Oh, OK. I'll remember, going forward, to call you that. Thanks for the tip, doofus, ya tinfoil hat Nazi leftard.

​

No, I really wouldn't.

LOL

Since you do nothing on TOL but lie, why would you expect me to take you seriously when you pretend, as you do here, that you do not want the truth silenced? Of course you want it silenced, doofus.

​

You're kinda hilarious in a bizarre sorta way and I don't want you to be silenced at all. Does that bother you?

Then tell me, doofus: Why do you do nothing on TOL but lie about me, and others, and misrepresent us, you Nazi leftard?

​

I have to give you some sort of kudos for not falling asleep while typing that whole load of prattle. "Bearing false witness"? That would be the likes of you who call people "Nazi leftards" and insisting that anyone with opposing views want you censored and the like. Entertaining as all get out though.

I only call Nazi leftards "Nazi leftards", which is why I call you a Nazi leftard.

​

Uh, if you were on my ignore list then I wouldn't be responding to you, dingbat. Again, entertainment value alone....

Non sequitur, doofus.

​

Um, no, I admitted to a handful of reports in 14 years on here that had nothing to do with wanting people silenced but kicked into touch for inappropriate behaviour.

Um, yes, here, once again, you're admitting that you were trying to silence certain persons from being able to say certain things, you lying tinfoil hat Nazi leftard.

​

Sure they do as you've more than "capably" evidenced with this reply alone. This is hysterical...

No, they don't, you raving Nazi leftard. But, you've just told me that people have a right to say or think, for instance, that black people are sub-human. On the contrary, nobody has a right to think or say that black people are sub-human.

Only a tinfoil hat Nazi leftard such as yourself could be such a numskull fool as to not be able to notice that having freedom and/or power to do something is not the same thing as having a right to do it. But, you obviously cannot tell the difference.

No, you Nazi leftard, nobody has a right to think or say that black people are sub-human, despite the fact that you claim that people do have a right to think or say that black people are sub-human.

​

You don't even understand how the ignore function works on here do you?

Well, I think I already said I had never used "Ignore" before; can you really not read, doofus? So, I just now tried it out momentarily, to see how it works, doofus.

​

That's funny in itself

It's really not that funny, though, when you stop and think about it, is it, doofus? Nah, not really.

​

but even if I did have you on ignore it wouldn't in any way encumber your freedom of speech, it would just allow me the pleasure of not seeing your posts.

LOL

By definition, for you to have me on "Ignore" would necessarily be for you to encumber my freedom of speech inasmuch as it were for you to encumber my freedom of speech to you, doofus. I mean, how abjectly stupid must one be to assert what you just asserted, doofus!

 

[7djengo7]

Arthur Brain has already replied to your comments, above.

Oh, is he your parent/guardian? Your personal spokesman? Branch out...try to think for yourself.

​

Where did you go to school?

I went to school in the same geographic region wherein I lived while I went to school. What is your favorite color?

What qualifications did you gain?

Among other things, I'm qualified to determine when sad intellectual-pygmies such as yourself are fishing for material out of which to try and craft ad hominem attacks against me, as you're transparently doing, here (and not for the first time). What is your favorite flavor of ice cream? How often do you eat spinach?​

​

I thought your Constitution was all about government of, for and by the people?

Point?

 

[chair]

Meanwhile, back in the real world, about 20,000 Americans test positive for COVID-19 every day. This number has been steady for some time. The good news is that less Americans are dying from it- about 770 per day right now, and slowly dropping. This may mean that more testing is being done, so more asymptomatic or slightly symptomatic COVID-infected people are being found. So this non-existent epidemic is slowing down in the US. Let's hope the trend continues.

 

[Arthur Brain]

What (if anything) do you imagine that has to do with anything that I've written? That's right! It has nothing to do with anything I've written. As usual, you endeavor to shift attention away from the subject, because you've got no argument.

Is Trump a socialist in your "mind"? Otherwise, it has everything to do with your bat crazy on here. Your republican president enacted the lockdown.

Oh, OK. I'll remember, going forward, to call you that. Thanks for the tip, doofus, ya tinfoil hat Nazi leftard.

Oh wow, the projection is strong with this one. "Tinfoil hat Nazi leftard"?! Priceless and ironic all at once...:rotfl:

LOL

Since you do nothing on TOL but lie, why would you expect me to take you seriously when you pretend, as you do here, that you do not want the truth silenced? Of course you want it silenced, doofus.

Oh, I'd never want the truth silenced, or you even.

Then tell me, doofus: Why do you do nothing on TOL but lie about me, and others, and misrepresent us, you Nazi leftard?

Hey, point out the lie you think I'm saying and I'll address it. Seriously, be specific and let's discuss. Otherwise, I'm being accused of wanting to stifle freedom of speech and censor you which is blatantly untrue and unsupportable. Then again, I am talking to a poster who seems to have the maturity of an eggplant...

I only call Nazi leftards "Nazi leftards", which is why I call you a Nazi leftard.

Well, no. You call me such because you're either a kid with a lot of growing up to do or some dumb adult who should have already grown up.

Non sequitur, doofus.

Um, no. If you were familiar with how the ignore function works then the only way I could actually respond to your posts would be to take you off the thing.

Um, yes, here, once again, you're admitting that you were trying to silence certain persons from being able to say certain things, you lying tinfoil hat Nazi leftard.

Do you ever disagree with a moderator decision where people are banned on here? By your standards, they're stifling freedom of speech. I've only reported things that have absolutely crossed a line on here or outright trolling and spamming and even then, the aim wasn't to see people booted in the main but just to be kicked into touch.

No, they don't, you raving Nazi leftard. But, you've just told me that people have a right to say or think, for instance, that black people are sub-human. On the contrary, nobody has a right to think or say that black people are sub-human.

Only a tinfoil hat Nazi leftard such as yourself could be such a numskull fool as to not be able to notice that having freedom and/or power to do something is not the same thing as having a right to do it. But, you obviously cannot tell the difference.

No, you Nazi leftard, nobody has a right to think or say that black people are sub-human, despite the fact that you claim that people do have a right to think or say that black people are sub-human.

Of course they have the right to "think" it as there's no such thing as the thought police. It's dumb and ignorant beyond words to believe such but it's their right. If they post garbage like that then they have the right to get banned too although according to you, they shouldn't be because it's silencing people's freedom of speech. Would I be in the wrong to report someone who posted racism? Which is it?

Well, I think I already said I had never used "Ignore" before; can you really not read, doofus? So, I just now tried it out momentarily, to see how it works, doofus.

Well, would have been sensible to acquaint yourself with how it works before making such a clown of yourself wouldn't it?

It's really not that funny, though, when you stop and think about it, is it, doofus? Nah, not really.

Not side splittingly so but amusing enough.

LOL

By definition, for you to have me on "Ignore" would necessarily be for you to encumber my freedom of speech inasmuch as it were for you to encumber my freedom of speech to you, doofus. I mean, how abjectly stupid must one be to assert what you just asserted, doofus!

So, your idea of encumbering freedom of speech is if the person who you're posting to utilises a function where they're spared from seeing it?

You really are somewhat hatstand...

 

[ok doser]

:mock: artie, the nazi leftard

 

[7djengo7]

Is Trump a socialist in your "mind"? Otherwise, it has everything to do with your bat crazy on here. Your republican president enacted the lockdown.

LOL

Remember, you're the doofus who denies that a lockdown is a ban against people leaving their residential housing, and who claims that a lockdown is permission for people to leave their residential housing at will.

So, exactly what (if anything) are you referring to by your phrase, "the lockdown"?

Is Trump the one who enacted the various socialist state governors' (Cuomo, Whitmer, Insley, Brown, Newsome, etc.) COVID19 executive orders, or are those governors the enactors of their own executive orders?

​

Oh wow, the projection is strong with this one. "Tinfoil hat Nazi leftard"?! Priceless and ironic all at once...:rotfl:

LOL

Why you gotta always project, u tinfoil hat Nazi leftard?

LOLOL @ u always whining about my using "LOL", and yet, you use "ROTFL". Classic tinfoil hat juvenile delinquent Nazi leftard hypocrisy from you, a classic tinfoil hat juvenile delinquent Nazi leftard.:rotfl:

LOFLROL

​

Oh, I'd never want the truth silenced, or you even.

Oh, joy! Rapture!

​

Hey, point out the lie you think I'm saying and I'll address it.

Spare me. I've time after time after time pointed out many of your lies, and all you ever do is stonewall about them, and continue lying.

​

Seriously, be specific and let's discuss.

LOL

Again, spare me. You've over and over made it manifest that you're not the least bit interested in serious discussion.

​

Well, no. You call me such because you're either a kid with a lot of growing up to do or some dumb adult who should have already grown up.

Well, no. You are called a tinfoil hat Nazi leftard by me because you are a tinfoil hat Nazi leftard--with a lot of growing up to do, who should have already grown up.

​

Do you ever disagree with a moderator decision where people are banned on here?

Disagree about what? That's like asking if I disagree with, say, the decision of the owner of a car who decides to not let this or that person, who is not the owner of the car, drive the car. The owners of TOL (who, I take it, have deputized the moderators with some prerogative to decide whom to ban) do not owe anybody a forum.

​

By your standards, they're stifling freedom of speech.

No doy, Professor. That's what banning someone from a forum is: stifling freedom of speech. One who is banned from presenting speech in a forum has, therein, had some of his or her freedom of speech stifled.

​

I've only reported things that have absolutely crossed a line on here or outright trolling and spamming and even then, the aim wasn't to see people booted in the main but just to be kicked into touch.

And that's you attempting to, to some extent, stifle some freedom of speech. No way around that.

​

Of course they have the right to "think" it as there's no such thing as the thought police.

No, they have no right to think evilly, to think what is false. Nobody does. Here, also, you speak as a genuine God-hating, state-worshiping Nazi leftard, saying that people have rights, or do not have rights, depending upon whether or not there is a state with a police apparatus over those people. Nope, sorry, the state you worship is not the source of rights; it is neither a bestower of rights, nor a withholder of them.

Try to reflect on just how abjectly stupid is what you just now wrote. You may as well also say something like, "Of course they have the right to murder as there's no such thing as the murder police", which would be no more idiotic for you to say than what you said.

​

It's dumb and ignorant beyond words to believe such but it's their right.

On the contrary, nobody has a right to believe falsehood.

​

If they post garbage like that then they have the right to get banned too although according to you, they shouldn't be because it's silencing people's freedom of speech.

I don't remember having said that anybody should, or shouldn't, be banned from posting.

​

Would I be in the wrong to report someone who posted racism? Which is it?

"Race" and "racism" are meaningless slogans. But, nobody'd be wrong to complain about, say, someone asserting a falsehood such as that all Chinese people are subhuman, and nobody has a right to assert said falsehood.

 

[7djengo7]

So, back to the debate:

Dogs are used to check for explosives and drugs. Maybe it will work for this virus- it's worth checking.
Infected people aren't criminals- but they are dangerous to everybody around them. So we need to identify them. It's true that this cuts into personal freedom, but so do many other things that are accepted in free societies. Even a traffic light limits me. In this case, the balance is tipped heavily towards curtailing personal freedom. It's unfortunate, but that's the case.

"this" cuts into personal freedom? Not "this", but "they"--the Nazi leftard "science" tyrants whose collectivist Kool-Aid you're drunk on--THEY are the ones cutting into, and endeavoring to cut into, personal freedom. THEY are persons. They are people--persons--who trample, and endeavor to trample, on persons' rights; things that are not persons are not tyrants. Why do you try to whitewash such tyrants of the culpability of their transgressions against the rights of their victims?

And it is called COVID-19. Calling it the "Wuhan" virus is a xenophobic attempt to lay the blame for 100,000 American deaths on the Chinese.​

By "lay the blame for 100,000 American deaths on the Chinese", do you mean "lay the blame for 100,000 American deaths on ALL OF the Chinese [people]", or do you mean "blame 100,000 deaths on SOME, BUT NOT ALL OF the Chinese [people]"? Maybe, as usual, you do not mean a bloomin' thing (as we well know how you disdain meaning things as being "semantical"), and you're just trying to smother dissent with more of your bleeding-heart emotionalism.

So, which is it? Are you accusing somebody of blaming "100,000 American deaths" on ALL the Chinese, or are you accusing them of blaming "100,000 American deaths" on ONLY SOME, BUT NOT ALL the Chinese? Would you call blaming something on ONLY SOME, BUT NOT ALL the Chinese, "xenophobic"?​

 

[chair]

So, which is it? Are you accusing somebody of blaming "100,000 American deaths" on ALL the Chinese, or are you accusing them of blaming "100,000 American deaths" on ONLY SOME, BUT NOT ALL the Chinese?

Ask President Trump.

 

[eider]

Ask President Trump.

Hi.......
President Trump's suggestion (at his Tulsa rally) not to test for Covid so that cases of it would not be seen to rise........ that's gone round the World.

 

[User Name]

Hi.......
President Trump's suggestion (at his Tulsa rally) not to test for Covid so that cases of it would not be seen to rise........ that's gone round the World.

My God, what an utter buffoon! We are truly living in bizarre times. Certainly, the worst since the 1960s. And hopefully, it won't get any worse...

 

[ok doser]

Hi.......
President Trump's suggestion (at his Tulsa rally) not to test for Covid so that cases of it would not be seen to rise........ that's gone round the World.

How many times have YOU been tested?

 

[KerimF]

While a few hundred thousand (about 0,003% of earth population) died because of coronavirus and about 3 millions (about 0.03%) were infected by it, not less than 97% of humans on earth were convinced via 'all' sorts of media (claimed being of opposing independent camps) that they live a pandemic.

It happens I am among the remaining 3% because I didn't hear any system (local or foreign) warning me of a pandemic (or even epidemic) when the toll of deaths was much higher, up to 10 times if not 100 in rare years, because of the cold virus which, naturally, hits once or twice almost yearly and in new disguise.

So I leave, as an intellectual exercise (for your own knowledge only), the reason(s) for which many millions (perhaps billions, if not trillions) of dollars were invested by all world's systems thru various international organizations (starting from WHO) to convince the world's peoples that their planet earth lives indeed a severe pandemic.

 

[User Name]

While a few hundred thousand (about 0,003% of earth population) died because of coronavirus and about 3 millions (about 0.03%) were infected by it, not less than 97% of humans on earth were convinced via 'all' sorts of media (claimed being of opposing independent camps) that they live a pandemic.

No? This will convince you otherwise, if you have any sense: https://public.flourish.studio/visu...If2N08ak2_xRyfn4uqsx0nWoZg9xjat3G_gXUqKKzZQ-Q

 

[KerimF]

No? This will convince you otherwise, if you have any sense: https://public.flourish.studio/visu...If2N08ak2_xRyfn4uqsx0nWoZg9xjat3G_gXUqKKzZQ-Q

Thank you for your care though I couldn't open the link now. I wonder what it says.

 

[ok doser]

Thank you for your care though I couldn't open the link now. I wonder what it says.

What it says is misleading, as one might expect from UN. It compares deaths from the Chinese Flu to all sorts of things, OTHER than the top ten killers, globally.

For those, go here: https://www.who.int/gho/mortality_burden_disease/causes_death/top_10/en/

 

[eider]

My God, what an utter buffoon! We are truly living in bizarre times. Certainly, the worst since the 1960s. And hopefully, it won't get any worse...

:chuckle:
It's not just your lot, you know.
We the Brit people need to be shaken awake, then stirred thoroughly, because our idea of voting now is to look at the goody list on offer and then choose....... a bit like a take-away meal for delivery which we don't need to cook but can then moan about.

What has shaken us awake before is some serious risk or other, or the aftermath of some dreadful situation. We need shocking..... and I guess that's what might help the US. If your President is returned to office then that could be the catalyst for great changes, four years on?