Conspiracy - Are Some Theories Accurate?

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
b98dcd799b96f1ff2e2271d868391865.jpg
 

WatchmanOnTheWall

Well-known member
Where do you get that? I am Pauline - the gospel of grace. I've never preach works in my life. Your awareness is pitiful.

Sorry, my mistake I thought you had disagreed with me about my 'What ever happened to..' thread but having checked I see you were just making non sequitur comments. However, I am not a false prophet, you can't say that unless I give a prophesy. Instead I am just repeating what others have concluded from there research and calculations, which I happen to agree with. Or at lease wait till after the time of the said event before assuming it won't take place. After all you can't prove it won't happen which makes you equally as false/correct as me. :) http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...-in-2022-and-Jesus-returns-in-2029&highlight=
 

WatchmanOnTheWall

Well-known member
based on their pride?

Why is it pride to spread "strive to follow Jesus' teachings are essential for salvation"?

You are way off, friend.

It is so anti-Christ comment.

Your comment is not narrow way because that's what most churches agree.

Even PJ agrees with you.

You can't work/worm your way into Heaven.
 

WatchmanOnTheWall

Well-known member

According to a book by a psychoanalyst, Walter Langer, called The Mind of Hitler, not only was Hitler supported by the Rothschilds, he WAS a Rothschild.

This revelation fits like a glove with the actions of the Rothschilds and other Illuminati bloodlines in Germany who brought Hitler to the fore as dictator of that nation. He was also supported by the British Royal Family, the House of Windsor (in truth the German House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha), and these included the British royal "war hero", Lord Mountbatten, a Rothschild and a Satanist.

Their royal relatives in Germany, who you would never have thought would normally support an apparent guy from the street like Hitler, were among his most enthusiastic supporters. But, of course, they knew who he really was. There is no way in the world when you do any study of the Illuminati obsession with bloodline that Hitler would not have been one of them.

Langer writes:

"Adolf’s father, Alois Hitler, was the illegitimate son of Maria Anna Schicklgruber. It was generally supposed that the father of Alois Hitler (Schicklgruber) was Johann Georg Hiedler. There are some people who seriously doubt that Johann Georg Hiedler was the father of Alois… (an Austrian document was) prepared that proved Maria Anna Schicklgruber was living in Vienna at the time she conceived.

At that time she was employed as a servant in the home of Baron Rothschild. As soon as the family discovered her pregnancy she was sent back home... where Alois was born."

Langer’s information came from the high level Gestapo officer, Hansjurgen Koehler, published in 1940, under the title "Inside the Gestapo". He writes about the investigations into Hitler’s background carried out by the Austrian Chancellor, Dolfuss, in the family files of Hitler.

Koehler actually viewed a copy of the Dolfuss documents which were given to him by Heydrich, the overlord of the Nazi Secret Service. The file, he wrote, "caused such havoc as no file in the world ever caused before" (Inside the Gestapo, p 143).

Thanks PJ
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
I know that's the most churches lame excuse to dismiss Jesus' teachings.
Or you have it wrong.

Majority is not narrow way.
It depends on which majority. The majority of people walking around? Okay. The majority of Methodists? :idunno: The majority changes depending on the size and type of groups. Christ didn't say most people who would follow him would be mistaken. That's just something you say.
 

meshak

BANNED
Banned
Or you have it wrong.


It depends on which majority. The majority of people walking around? Okay. The majority of Methodists? :idunno: The majority changes depending on the size and type of groups. Christ didn't say most people who would follow him would be mistaken. That's just something you say.


not you again.

peace.
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
@Town Heretic - Would you say that believing in evolution, multi-verses, parallel universes, different dimensions, dark matter, transhumanism and occult practices, aliens etc, are "dangerous"?
That's like asking if I think the flag, vegetables and cannibalism are dangerous. You're mixing things in that won't allow for an up or down, yes or no.

Tell "anyone" that stops by what the really dangerous things to talk about are.
I didn't say the topics were dangerous. I've said that elevating nonsense to respectability is dangerous.

That's not liberal socialist thinking on your part?
Well, not being a liberal or a socialist, likely no. But your rushing to those labels speaks to the problem that arises when anyone confuses the ability to declare something with the truth.

Since you're so concerned of the dangers of this thread tell us what's ok to talk about and have interest in.
Supra. It's not the topic, it's what you do with it or fail to do.

The people need to be informed. :thumb:
If only you believed that. Being informed isn't changing a serious position based on an unsourced, one sided bit of enfotainment on Youtube.
 
Top