Sorry, you have a link that goes to some conspiracy network, not the Washington Post. We're to conclude you don't actually have a checkable source for your claim?
Fair enough.
Fair enough.
Sorry, you have a link that goes to some conspiracy network, not the Washington Post. We're to conclude you don't actually have a checkable source for your claim?
Fair enough.
Sorry, you have a link that goes to some conspiracy network, not the Washington Post. We're to conclude you don't actually have a checkable source for your claim?
Jerry, you'd do better if you left off your fixation with Algore and focused on the evidence. I'd sure like to see a checkable source for that quote, though. What do you have?