1 Corinthians 15:3-4
Again... does God now transgress His own Law? Isn't this our Divine Kings answer that fully supports the premise of what is being said?
John 8:7
7 So when they continued asking Him, He raised Himself up and said to them, “He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first.”
Since "Carnal" death is nothing compared to "Spiritual" Death... shall we now say that Jesus "Spiritually Stones" unborn Babies?
They accused her of breaking a Law within the Law.
He wrote a the ground with His finger.
It had been with the finger of God that the Ten Commandments had been written and it had been with the finger of God that Jesus performed His miracles.
And He knew men's hearts.
And Hebrew is short jots and tittles.
Sort of like our texting today - c u ltr for see you later, k, for okay.
He wrote a jot and tittle for each of the Ten Commandments and then basically said to them "any of you not guilty of one of these, throw the first stone at her."
He was talking about those sins.
By the way, He raised Himself up and then forgave a woman caught in adultry; right?
Quite the symbolism, there.
For your consideration:
If the federal headship of Adam and the imputation of his sin unto all his posterity be repudiated, then what alternative is left us?
Only that of the separate testing of each individual. If the race were not placed on probation in the first man, then each of his offspring
must stand trial for himself. But the conditions of such a trial make success impossible,
People that liken the cross to "sweeping under the rug" are false.
Because you don't actually know what He wrote, I counter... He wrote the only commandment that He ever officially gave to All mankind, while with us... I believe He Wrote into the very dust of the earth we came from...
"Love the Lord your God with All your Heart and Soul and Love your Neighbor as yourself."
After all... He said... (John 15:13)
Then He bled on that dust to seal His utter, perfect LOVE for us.
Same hand of God... Two separate Covenants... The Devil is afraid of the dispensational details.
AMEN... I AGREE! What is your disagreement with me? Do you embrace "Augustine Original Sin" or not?
Where do you see that, Nick?
If there was any innocent you would be correct but since all are guilty that argument fails.
As Adam was the federal representative of mankind as Jesus is the federal head of all saved God rightfully passed the judgement onto Adam's progeny. Psalms 58:3 and in Adam all die describes this graphically.
TOL.
TOL PTSD, lol
In fairness, the guy was never made to feel "welcome to counter any" of your "us."
Many like him did not start out that way on TOL.
Rather, shortly after he began stating his views on TOL, he was continually maligned and ganged up on by some.
Gradually, he began to treat such in kind.
Though he is off in his allowing himself their same spiritual self-defeat.
Or as the Apostle Paul warned...
1 Corinthians 15:33 Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners.
It is an issue we all have to face. Some automatically able to face it better than others.
Others needing to walk by faith (myself included), when the sin which is in each our respective members comes a callin with its' lie.
The guy ran smack into the elitism of some, only to end up allowing himself to go down to their level with them.
Galatians 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
5:8 This persuasion cometh not of him that calleth you.
5:9 A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.
5:13 For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.
5:14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
5:15 But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.
5:16 This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.
5:17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.
5:18 But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
The Spirit would never lead a member of the Body to put him or herself and or another, back under the Law's Performance Based Acceptance.
??? Adam's sin does not show my sin, the law reveals my sin. Singular. There are countless every day, but it only takes one. Adam's transgression was dealt with at the cross. Without the cross, you will perish. You continue to see to reject this. Calvinism has nothing to do with it. Calvinism is false, but Adam's one act resulted in condemnation for all, including those that did not sin like Adam.
You don't have to ad a mention to every post. There are 2 notifications every time you do it. One for the quote, one for the mention.
I'm casting aside that old "classical Augustine Doctrine". It makes God out to be a transgressor of His Law and I am an Open Theist, so I don't believe that God condemned me before I was born! I believe He Loved me and "knew" of me, but is sincerely walking with me relationally in my life as it unfolds and only uses His omniscience upon my request. Which, believe you me, I have already asked!
How could a Just God IMPUTE SIN to the UNBORN? This is counter to everything we read in scripture?
That's my perspective. I look forward to your counter.
I fully understand that you will be back later. I also understand your argument. But consider that the One Righteous Judge is being Accused of Imputing Guilt in a PREDESTINED fashion.
Are we Reformed?
Or are we Acts 11:26 Followers that Are self admitted sinners of repentant hearts?
I'm casting aside that old "classical Augustine Doctrine". It makes God out to be a transgressor of His Law and I am an Open Theist, so I don't believe that God condemned me before I was born! I believe He Loved me and "knew" of me, but is sincerely walking with me relationally in my life as it unfolds and only uses His omniscience upon my request. Which, believe you me, I have already asked!
How could a Just God IMPUTE SIN to the UNBORN? This is counter to everything we read in scripture?
That's my perspective. I look forward to your counter.
And as a result, unable to be righteous in his own strength.
and as a result, one is unable to be righteous (patient continuance in well doing) in one's own strength for very long.
And even that little bit is "as filthy rags."
Scripture tells us the soul that sinneth shall die. The wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him...not on his sons that come after him.
Ezek. 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Have you ever seen a newborn speaking lies and going astray? It's a figure of speech for early on in life. Most verses refer to going astray in one's youth. David was a youth when he fought the Philistine. It's also the time when children know to choose good over evil.
Anyway, so, Adam's federal headship is greater than our LORD's? Why is it that all men are born spiritually dead because of Adam, but only some are made alive when they believe in Christ. You don't see the disparity there? :think:
What that particular "condemnation" was is up for debate it seems.
People that liken the cross to "sweeping under the rug" are false.