Any friend to Jesus is no friend to lies like CRT.
Everyone should be able to agree that CRT is a lie born in hell.
Let's talk about that. If one sides with evil during their evil, what kind of 'friend' does that make one?
"Like out of control?" :thinking. I believe it is a very controlled series of posts. Was this a truthful assessment,, or were you exaggerating, you know in another kind of verbal attack?
Watch:
Wasn't true. I was not seeking to 'break you.' It leaves you inept or doing this on purpose. Just wrong or did you lie?
Wasn't true. I'd said I'd watched it on the news. It wouldn't be 'my' opinion then. Just wrong or did you lie?
Show me. Show me ONE insult. Just one. Show me instead of what to me is a false accusation.
Maybe not. It is ever my attempt. Growing, being honest, and knowing truth cannot be shoved. I agree.
I'm not really worried about an ignore list, Anna. I'm concerned with truth and discussion, not banter or mistruth.
Truth is truth is truth. I cannot and won't change my character. I will continue to work on being better. You can go ahead and run away. I've asked nothing of you but truth. I do expect it and it is the reason for this part of the discussion. -Lon
Another, for the record. Look at what I'd said:
No, I hadn't noticed. I guess I was busy having a conversation while you were seeking the approval of men.
Shifting blame, are you?
At least it seemed monstrous to me and of course with a little flourish on your quote, it was the exact problem. I don't know why chopping off part of a quote, to make is say something else, wouldn't be considered monstrous (let alone truthful). It makes me out to be that guy and wasn't honest or nice.
This was perhaps the hardest for me to read. The guy wasn't nice, reported clearly on a slant, so even beginning a thread with a bit of a snarky, mean, unscrupulous reporter is a bit of a nonstarter on a Christian thread where we are trying to discuss what is actual instead of what one reporter either cannot see in himself, or is just this dishonest would say. Anna, either duped (harder for me to believe, I really do think of her as intelligent enough), or just wanted to 'bait' similarly as Whitmire? There are certainly baiting words given to Christian conservatives here. I honestly believe it is the proverbial elephant in the room. As far as I can see, there isn't a lot of substance (some) regarding a good discussion of Critical Race Theory. As I have stated, I probably shouldn't have come to this thread either, the hook was already baited for a totally different discussion than the one I believe needs to take place. This thread was meant, rather (even if not Anna's attempt and that is being gracious if you read the first two pages), to be alienating where 'blocking Lon' is but one inevitability from taking such a stance. I lament that politics to 'split us apart' as a nation are continuing and I cannot help but see that this is the intent and focus here. I'd love to be wrong, but that will be a long discussion with a lot of quotes. There are a lot of baited statements. -Lon
Probably a good starter to the thread I thought I was participating in. It raises good questions and though liberal, looks honestly at those conservatives that oppose Critical Race Theory seminars.
During not only one but two! (count 'em 2!!) Democrat administrations
Online learning, where the parents have finally gotten to see the absolutely horrible crap being taught to their children, has been a disaster for public school systems.
He had been asked before the event to remove that part from his speech and had declined to do that.
So, please enlighten us. But you can't use terms like white-washed, white privilege and white worship in your explanation because those demonstrate that you have also fallen into the same propaganda trap you accuse right-wingers of believing.
