annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Christian Taliban.
chrysostom
- Thread starter chrysostom
- Start date
Christian Taliban.
Incorrect.
Pro-life for the unborn, pro-death-penalty for the murderer. Get it right.
These two murderers should have been put to death.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_James_Bulger
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I think you just like the idea of killing people.
And if you ban me for telling you that you're one sick individual I'll tell you what I have before. If you as a mod going to engage in a discussion you should be able to take it as well as you dish it out whether you're a mod or not. But to say what you want and then retreat to your ban hammer when you don't like how the discussion is going is cowardly.
Again, God said the only people who should be having sex are a husband and his wife.
Anything outside of that is immoral.
Having "age of consent" laws is inherently a violation of that, because it affirms the act of having sex outside of marriage.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Yep, he's caught himself out with this though because for the sake of consistency he can't be against children getting married if they give their consent. So a forty year old bloke can get married to a nine year old girl and if he has sex with her then there's nothing wrong with it. Obviously there's a reason why we have age of consent laws, to protect children from the likes of the above.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
The law protects children, something you don't seem to care much about once they're born.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
How is it a violation of that? Having laws that determine that children aren't of sufficient capacity to give informed consent to sex isn't undoing the sanctity of marriage. You're just digging yourself in deeper and deeper.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I view age of consent laws as a way to protect children and teens from adults, as they should.
:think: Or it confirms that children shouldn’t be having sex OR marrying. Any adult who would marry a child (and have sex with them) would be a predator because children do not have the ability to consent.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Reminds me of the duck-picking threads...lain:
Except that by JR's standards they can be a fair bit younger than 15 if there's no age of consent laws. He's completely undone himself on this because if he's okay with trying and executing five year old's for murder and having no age of consent laws then there can't be a minimum age for marriage either. Beyond pathetic.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
So does anyone with a functioning moral compass and an ounce of common sense.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I'm so thankful for the separation of church and state.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
They knew what they were doing on that score. To protect society from religious lunacy like this.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
And yet from that sermon that Jerry posted yesterday, we know there are too many who would insert church into government if they could.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Thankfully, they can't although they can influence to a certain extent...
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
And that's why they pack the courts... and not just the Supreme Court. The Federal courts as well.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
That is a concern.
For now ...