truthjourney
New member
Anybody who disagrees with you is uniformed, right? Or they don't really know anything about it as you said that I didn't.He is uninformed. We have never been told to not debate online. It is his own opinion. Years ago we were instructed to stay away from the Internet because it was dangerous. Now JWs have a Website of our own! We also conduct Bible studies by email. Now what would be wrong with instant messaging? It's just email that is faster. And these religious forums? Not much different than emailing or instant messaging. Things have changed a great deal. Thankfully not many of us go into these forums, because not everybody is suitably experienced. It's tricky sometimes when an ex-JW comes into the forums and begins putting down the WTS and the Governing Body, and I can spot them easily. Others might not be able to and could become somewhat frustrated, not knowing all of our history, etc., like someone like me who is familiar with all of our history and all the reasons why we have done the things we have done.
You are not being honest about what you've said in this post. I have provided ample evidence about the Watchtower Society even from their own publications and you still are in denial. I posted quotes from their Watchtower magazines and you denied those quotes to be accurate and true yet they came straight from the Governing Body, approved by the Governing Body.
I have posted videos with court proceedings against the Watchtower regarding their cover up about child sex abuse; their hiding and even destroying evidence and protecting the perpetrators. The Watchtower is having to pay $4,000 a day because they refuse to release the names of perpetrators within the Watchtower organization to the authorities so that a thorough investigation can be done to seek justice for the child victim and to protect other children and to charge the perpetrators with crimes. In the meantime, even members of the congregation are not told about the perpetrators. There is "a time to keep quiet" and to "keep things confidential." And the elders obey that to the letter because the Governing Body tells them to.
The perpetrator is free to roam the Kingdom halls where children are present. They are free to take a child door to door in the preaching work being alone with the child. Members of the public are not informed about the perpetrator to better protect their own children. This is all documented evidence in courts of law and it cannot be denied. It is public record.
And the two witness rule is being used as a way to avoid releasing evidence and to protect perpetrators. When other people are disfellowshipped for much less offenses but child molestation, well, no two witnesses to that so according to the Watchtower nothing can be done except to "leave it in Jehovah's hands". So the perpetrator is free to continue abusing children because surely he isn't going to allow any witnesses to that.
Who in their right mind would have such a ridiculous policy that relates to two witnesses to child molestation.
Daughters getting raped by their JW fathers who are elders and nothing is done except maybe the daughter gets disfellowshipped because she won't change her story and clear her father's name.Then she's shunned by her JW family and treated like she's dead. Wives being beaten by their husbands who are JW elders but the wife is blamed because she isn't being obedient and subservient enough and doesn't do enough to please her husband. So the wife is forced to stay with an abusive husband and continue to be beaten or if she tries to leave or tries to get a divorce then she faces being disfellowshipped; being shunned by her JW family.
Should I go on? I have lots to say.