One scripture says that before Christ met him he had the nick name Peter, and the other scripture says that Christ named him Peter. And the Catholics claim they are the successor in place of Peter. Now I ask you, which scripture do you think is correct?Why deny the obvious, when you don't have to
It is seriously retarded to even have this debated- Simon's name was changed to Peter 'Rock', and he declared it all to him right in front of the other apostles.
One scripture says that before Christ met him he had the nick name Peter, and the other scripture says that Christ named him Peter.
Only in your mind.So you're going to try and win the argument by demanding the Bible contradicts itself
It's pretty easy to solve what seems to be a contradiction- Matthew spoke of Peter after the fact, probably having already died in Rome.
Viola.
Post #35The info is in the library of Congress. Have fun!