annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I would like to get the chance to vote in June. I will if I am still alive to do so.
Thinking of you, Desert Reign.
I would like to get the chance to vote in June. I will if I am still alive to do so.
Thanks. Still here, just...Thinking of you, Desert Reign.
Thanks. Still here, just...
Thank you for your presence here, for sharing with us how your mind works and your heart loves.
They have had more than enough chances over the last 50 years.Seems to me like the EU is going to have to change, or fly apart. I think I can see why Britain might want out. But I think that the chance to reform it into something more healthy is greater with them in, and I think it would really harm both if there's a Brexit.
They have had more than enough chances over the last 50 years.
If us leaving would be bad for the EU, it proves that something is wrong with it.
We pay more than we get back. So they would lose money to pay for their crackpot schemes.
The EU wants to form a super state. We don't. Let them get on with it. Let's not be a thorn in their side. Let's just acknowledge our differences and go our separate ways. Let them take responsibility for their actions.
We play fair with the rules whilst other EU countries don't. So we have become the dumping ground for EU migrants from vastly poorer countries who are allowed to come here and earn even just minimum wages and then get benefts for themselves and their children back home. Without Britain, they would have one less country to send all their Muslim migrants to that Angela Merkel so naively allowed in. They are clogging up our health services, our schools and putting pressure on our housing. So of course they want us to stay in. Of course, it is to their benefit. Ours is a stable society - they need us to support the rest of their instability.
They have had more than enough chances over the last 50 years.
If us leaving would be bad for the EU, it proves that something is wrong with it. We pay more than we get back. So they would lose money to pay for their crackpot schemes. The EU wants to form a super state. We don't. Let them get on with it. Let's not be a thorn in their side. Let's just acknowledge our differences and go our separate ways. Let them take responsibility for their actions. We play fair with the rules whilst other EU countries don't. So we have become the dumping ground for EU migrants from vastly poorer countries who are allowed to come here and earn even just minimum wages and then get benefts for themselves and their children back home. Without Britain, they would have one less country to send all their Muslim migrants to that Angela Merkel so naively allowed in. They are clogging up our health services, our schools and putting pressure on our housing. So of course they want us to stay in. Of course, it is to their benefit. Ours is a stable society - they need us to support the rest of their instability.
It is not an issue of right and wrong. There is no morality here. No one is guilty of anything if they want to leave the EU.Do you imagine that there would be nothing wrong with Britain standing alone? How long has it been since there was a referendum seeking to break up the country?
Yes, this is an issue but the EU is already full of severe inequalities, particularly the south-north divide and soon the impending far worse east-west divide. The principle of free movement of labour made sense with the early membership when countries were in a similar economic position to each other. But the facts have changed and principles are nothing but a liberal ideal, divorced from any connection with reality.Any union is asymmetrical. If you had everything you needed and wanted nothing from each other, why even bother? I guess the question for Britain is whether what they get is worth what they must give.
This was one of the scare tactics David Cameron tried to engratiate leavers with recently. 'If we leave there could be world war 3.' This kind of argument has only served to strengthen the resolve of the leavers.Europe is full of nations with large self-images and small lands in which to fulfill them. This has lead to some pretty spectacular conflicts in the past, but not as many since the founding of the EU. Maybe it's a coincidence...
23rd JuneWhen is the vote ?
It is not an issue of right and wrong. There is no morality here. No one is guilty of anything if they want to leave the EU.
Yes, this is an issue but the EU is already full of severe inequalities, particularly the south-north divide and soon the impending far worse east-west divide. The principle of free movement of labour made sense with the early membership when countries were in a similar economic position to each other. But the facts have changed and principles are nothing but a liberal ideal, divorced from any connection with reality.
This was one of the scare tactics David Cameron tried to engratiate leavers with recently. 'If we leave there could be world war 3.' This kind of argument has only served to strengthen the resolve of the leavers.
I can't comment on hypothetical issues.I agree, and I meant "wrong" in the same sense that you used it to refer to the EU. Britain as a lone entity has some serious structural issues that the EU helps to ameliorate, like
These issues have already been aired. Scotland has already been told in no uncertain trms that if they left the UK, they would not be able to use our currency. They would also be required to pay a reasonable share of the national debt. The EU has also told them that there would be no guarantee that the EU would have them. Scotland would become yet another country member of the EURO that would get into debt and need bailing out from time time.the Scottish independence question. Britain standing alone might be initially more comfortable to many English, because that places the English in a very dominant position, not having to deal as much with German and French positions, but where does that leave the Scots, who seem to have an increasingly distinct identity? And if the Scots are alienated, how does that union stand?
It doesn't look to me as if it is getting stronger. Weaker countries like Greece are simply not getting the uplift they expected from EU membership.and this is despite all the many subsidies they received. Ireland has only just got away with bankruptcy by the skin of their teeth. They are not ready fr EU membership. Such countries need to be already much stronger economically before membership. The EU, in its thirst for idealism, has reduced the requirements for membership, thus creating a false sense of security. So these small countries will rush to join and receive all the benefits, only to find that, like Greece, they will fall over soon enough and find themselves in a worse position than before.I think that ultimately the union must either become stronger or weaker, but the current position won't hold. A single currency, without unified regulation of banking, and the ability to act in the collective interests of the (currency) union is a problem.
If Greece decided to default, then they would have to leave the EU. THeir position is aready similar to a default: they are soon approaching the need for a third bailout. This means that the EURO will be further weakened. And they now want to bring Turkey in, do me a favour!Yes, I can see how it sounds like a kind of a Chicken Little scenario. But it's also certainly not an unprecedented direction for Europe to go, and especially with the economic turmoil, the rise of far-right-wing and neo-fascist movements, and the willingness of Russia to fund dissent movements, it seems wrong to me to dismiss the possibility. And I think it is pretty clear that engagement makes war a lot more difficult. What happens if major debtor nations in Europe opt to walk away from the Euro and default rather than pay? Germany has made a pretty big point of the fact that the existing structures of the union don't allow for transfers of wealth between members. Will they let the default stand, or will they try to do something to extract what Greece owes?
There will be no Brexit. Just like Clinton's presidency has already been decided no matter what votes may tally come this fall.
I'd rather have an analogous bomb under the economy than an *actual* bomb under my seat at a concert or in a shopping centre...
...which is precisely why the economy is less of a priority for me than open borders and unchecked immigration.
Cameron can fling out as many monetary scare stories as he wants... the majority of us are still voting to leave.
Roll on the 23rd...