Although the Bible has no over-arching story
Have you even READ the Bible cover to cover?
It does, in fact, have an overarching story, a "plot," if you will.
[historians think this view as naive],
:blabla:
the Bible remains a complex blend of remembered history, oral tradition, various traditions & theologies, allegories, myths, legends, metaphors and parables.
Taking the whole Bible into account reveals that it is a developing tradition where supposedly unchangeable things change and evolve through time.
For example, each gospel writer’s personal agendas can be traced and isolated.
1. The Bible is complex because it tells a story that spans around 5000 years.
2. The Bible is not a book of mythology. It is a book of history, law, poetry, admonition through letters (called epistles), and prophecy.
3. Taking the whole Bible into account (properly) shows that God has an overarching plan for mankind, and if man rejects Him, he will spend eternity apart from God, but if he loves God, then he will spend eternity with Him forever.
4. The Bible (which is God's Word), apart from God Himself, who is Truth, is the most objective source of truth that we have today. Looking at writing styles of the men who wrote the various portions of the Bible can tell us about the men, but to then imply that they put their own agenda into their writing of the portions they wrote defeats the purpose of God giving an account of History from an objective viewpoint, which results in an inherent distrust of some or all of what it says, because such implication leads to the possibility that what is written is not true at all. In other words, by implying that "each gospel writer’s personal agendas" had something to do with the Bible, you're effectively saying that the Bible may not be completely true, which destroys it's credibility, and even makes God out to be a liar. And that's blasphemy.
You should repent of your blasphemy.