We notice you conveniently ignore all the instances when Jesus advanced a conversation by calling people names.
The unvarnished Jesus has a unique voice print. This makes it easy to separate the later dogma and theology that was placed into his mouth after the crucifixion from the actual teachings and deeds of Jesus.
I see the evangelists as human beings who were inspired by God to write their different--and often contradictory--versions. Natrually, they looked for a Jesus that made sense for
them.
Much like some believers today: Thery want a Jesus who is against abortion, homosexuality, welfare, world peace-making, etc.
But he Jesus of the church has become a hypocrite. The church’s Jesus does not simply “walk his talk."
Those early follwers who were angry, resentful and violent painted a Jesus that agreed with them.
Jews a Jesus who spews vitriolic anti-Semitism simply because when John was written at a time when followers of Jesus were being banned from the synagogues. Jesus people were angry and they wanted a gospel that reflected their struggles.
Simple as that.
John’s community of believers were in severe conflict with Judaism and so they crafted their Jesus as a person who stood on the side of the Jesus people and who was angry and hateful toward their opponents.
Jesus was said to have taught “ALL” in parables and it is those parables that overturn conventional wisdom and point to an ethic that is nonviolent, anti-tribal, compassionate and merciful.
To me, Jesus is the ultimate disclosure of the divine in a human being. Jelousy, revenge, retributive justice, etc. are not part of the passion and character I see reavealed in Jesus of Nazareth. He did not preach or reflect the petty human characteristics people of the world exhibit.
The Jesus before Easter had none of the all-too-human traits of ordinary people.
That’s why his followers called him divine.