I thought all weapons were assault weapons?
Some weapons are assaultier than others.
I thought all weapons were assault weapons?
Mostly true (see the tenth amendment).No it doesn't. The bill of rights is about the people, not the governments of the states.
Mostly true (see the tenth amendment).
The second amendment is about the right of individuals to keep and bear arms, because militias are composed of individuals armed with privately owned weapons, and a well regulated militia is needed for the state to remain free from a centralized government or a foreign invader.
At the time the amendment was written, it referred to any weapon that any individual could own, including canons and other artillery.You are correct. Two points to bear in mind:
1. You wrote that it is their personal weapons. It is not clear from the amendment itself that that is what is meant.
The point is not whether any of the people belong to a State Militia.2. How many people who "bear arms" in the US today belong to a State Militia?
No, it is only for citizens of the United States.Does that include radicalised muslim citizens?
Crimially insane citizens?
Criminal citizens
Radical left wing ones who want top overthrow democracy?
A militia is a citizen army, but the leaders are appointed by the State.It isn't regulated by the government. That is why a militia is citizen army. Just so you know, I am not in a militia, have never been in one, or would I join one.
Some weapons are assaultier than others.
Why is the ability to have assault weapons important?
Define assault weapons? try to be specific...
Wikipedia says this:
It must be an individual weapon
It must be capable of selective fire
It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle
Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable box magazine[5]
And it should have an effective range of at least 300 metres (330 yards)
It gives sources for this definition.
The same article goes on the say this:
"Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are technically not assault rifles despite frequently being called such.
For example:
Select-fire M2 Carbines are not assault rifles; their effective range is only 200 meters.[18]
Select-fire rifles such as the FN FAL battle rifle are not assault rifles; they fire full-powered rifle cartridges.
Semi-automatic-only rifles like variants of the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities.
Semi-auto rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire.
The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges."[19]
History[edit]"-Wikipedia Assault rifle
It seems that in the US there has been some confusion over the term "assault rifle".
It has a specific meaningin the military world, but has been useddifferentlyincorrectly when referring to gun control.
:nono: Not among those who have a clue what they are talking about. The only confusion is among the ignorant (willful and otherwise) and the propagandists like the Brady's and Bloomberg's.
Fix't that for ya. lain:
Fix't that for ya. lain:
Honestly, I don't follow the US politics on these things that closely. I do think that the US could use better gun control. And when I was in the army, I knew how to handle my assault rifle, along with a handful of other weapons, irrespective of how it was classified.
fix your own posts
Why is the ability to have assault weapons important?
It must be capable of selective fire
The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges