Are you volunteering to spell the mods when they take their breaks?
Now that would be an event, no?
I read the woodshed all the time, and there are some posters who manage to be a second set of eyes for the mods....we have so many threads going on all the time. But, way too many sound like a bunch of tattletales on the school ground. (I'm sorry to have to admit, I'm in the latter group). I think I'd get to the point where I just said....All you guys are going for a time out. Then I'd have my break. :chuckle:
I get it. Sort of like, "kill them all and let God sort them out."
More seriously, I tend to report infrequently, usually on matters of the essentials of the faith in ECF, egregious matters of moral turpitude, or the occasional wing-nut's bad behavior. Reading the Woodshed gives plenty of insights into what gets attention and what is winked at, so I try to not fill up the mod in box with trifles. In most cases I just pos rep behind the scenes the one who troubles me with some words of advice or pointers to past posts from Knight, et al, relevant to their behavior.
There is merit in trying to be like the old E. F. Hutton commercial; "when he speaks everyone listens". I think a mod quickly learns who is overly sensitive and crying wolf often. It would be natural for the mod to start turning a blind eye to their reports. And thinking of the past, I knew a few who relished the role of being the name-taking hall or class monitor. For those who remember these folks, I need not remind anyone about how these folks fared socially. I am by no means implying I hold frequent reporters in disdain, for often they capture my own thoughts about this or that post being reported. I just blissfully assume that bad actors eventually percolate to the attention of the mod team without any help from my eye-balling and reporting.
Lastly, while the thread seems focused on the visible, the behind the scenes work likely consumes the majority of time. Dealing with moving, merging, editing threads, special group administration, member requests for this or that, instructing someone about "How do I?" or "Where can I find...?", hand-holding the indignant or the perceived insulted, shutting down trolls missed by automated tools, eliminating ugly content, investigating sock accounts, and more means the person needs to have confidence in their computer tools usage. A mod with high privileges can muck things up badly with a few errant mouse clicks. Not all persons can handle the work.
At the larger discussion sites, e.g., CF, mod training requires around 20-30 hours of personal time, with an exam given, just to learn all the procedures. Then the trainee is on probation for several weeks before they are turned loose on the masses. These folks are also measured by the amount of member neg rep reports (numbering in the hundreds) they manage from cradle to grave. It can become a full time job for some who are not disciplined and efficient.
AMR