Well, according to the Bible, God thought people being naked was decent.
Genesis 2:25 "And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed."
elo, I believe you just went full retard
but then you start at full retard, don't you?
Well, according to the Bible, God thought people being naked was decent.
Genesis 2:25 "And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed."
To make a lot of money? Cuz that's what they do.
For enticing men?
Here's another question:
Since we all know that glamour models dress provocatively in order to sell their products, what do they deserve?
For selling products. What a woman deserves for enticing a man is to be enticed by a man, I guess. That would seem fair.
I realize that ... and have no problem with their job. The issue is the double standard.
IMO, if someone has a vice (in this case lusting), it should be up to that person to take control and stay away.
IMO, if someone has a vice (in this case lusting), it should be up to that person to take control and stay away.
elo, I believe you just went full retard
but then you start at full retard, don't you?
For enticing men?
No, just for a living.
Only in your sick little world.
Oh, and dressing like a harlot or acting like a harlot is not a vice. :chuckle:
:shocked: Shame on them!
In my world a woman who entices a man deserves equal retribution, if any. That would be enticed for enticing, not raped or murdered for enticing. Only in a horribly sick world is it rape for an eye instead of eye for eye, so what does that say about your world where a woman deserves to be raped for how she dresses? That's certainly not reaping what one sows.
If they suffer any consequences as a result of their dress, or lack thereof, they deserve whatever they get.
Not complicated enough for you? :chew:
elo, I believe you just went full retard
Explain ...
Inherently? No.
Will anyone deny that models DO use their bodies to make money?