truthteller86
New member
That means Adam was really Joseph Nicephore Niepce. :think:Knight said:Maybe nobody existed until the invention of the camera???? :think:
That means Adam was really Joseph Nicephore Niepce. :think:Knight said:Maybe nobody existed until the invention of the camera???? :think:
Like who??? Give me an example. Give me an example of a historical figure from around the time of Jesus that you actually believe existed (since you are not sure about Caesar).allsmiles said:Yes.
A wiser man than myself once told me to not have an opinion one way or another on a subject about which I know nothing. I know you understand that, you'd have to be a fool not to and you're no fool... right?
Knight said:Like who??? Give me an example. Give me an example of a historical figure from around the time of Jesus that you actually believe existed (since you are not sure about Caesar).
And when you give that example please employ your own nugget of "wisdom"....
Outlaw said:I''ll bet he's sure the "missing link" existed.
:rotfl: no doubt, as well as ADONIS, APOLLO, APHRODITE, ARES, ARTEMIS and the rest.Outlaw said:I''ll bet he's sure the "missing link" existed.
Outlaw said:I''ll bet he's sure the "missing link" existed.
Ask away?allsmiles said:I am the missing link :chuckle:
Stick to the subject, you're only making yourself look more foolish by avoiding a single, direct question that should be easy for you to answer.
That statement doesn't even make sense, so I am ignoring it.allsmiles said:Is belief in Jesus the only evidence you have for his existence in our historical timeline?
Aw shucks, ya just don't get it do you? Poor little fella.Stick to the subject, you're only making yourself look more foolish by avoiding a single, direct question that should be easy for you to answer.
Knight said:That statement doesn't even make sense, so I am ignoring it.
Now, Give me an example of a historical figure from around the time of Jesus that you actually believe existed (since you are not sure about Caesar).
You continue...Aw shucks, ya just don't get it do you? Poor little fella.
We ARE on topic! We are painfully demonstrating the folly of your own argument. Someday when you grow up you will think back on this thread and think... "Man I was dumb." :doh:
allsmiles said:Is belief in Jesus the only evidence you have for his existence in our historical timeline?
Let's make this easy for you....allsmiles said:You wrap your mind around my question and deliver a civil answer to it.
Outlaw said:Let us see what you are asking... :think:
You want to know if the only evidence that Knight has for the existence of Jesus in our historical timeline is his belief in Jesus?
That makes no sense.
Are you denying that Jesus is not in our historical timeline?
All kidding and mocking aside, your question doesn't make sense. Seriously.allsmiles said:It certainly does and you understand it perfectly.
Knight said:Let's make this easy for you....
I believe Jesus existed (setting aside the divinity argument of course).
In order for us to discuss this logically I need to know if you believe ANYONE existed around the time of Jesus. I need a name. If you can't tell me that you believe any historical figure existed during that same time why should I waste my time discussing with you the existence of Jesus?
Don't ya see????
I need to test your sanity before I waste time taking you very seriously. Any nut that can't acknowledge that Augustus Caesar existed is on shaky ground with me.
Can anyone tell me why allsmiles doesn't want to give me a name of a person he believes existed around the same time as Jesus???
I know, do you?
As many as I can get.Knight said:How many chances do you want????
Yup, we got alot of work done in my opinion.Bob had you on his show 4 times!
I think I have taken advantage of that, I had no idea whan I signed on I would wind up with four thousand some odd posts and six radio appearences, and a sticky/archive thread, but it just happened.You also have infinite opportunity here on TOL to make your point
I want you to acknowledge that I "stepped up to the plate", what else do you want? :idunno:
I consider the shows "open phone policy" to be an invitation to call any time, I wanted to spend some time with you guys but it just didn't pan out. At the time you guys were tapeing I think I had two on hold and one on my ear, I was vaigly aware that now was the time but it wasen't a choice priority wise.Not to mention, I invited you to call the show, but you didn't call.
Knight said:All kidding and mocking aside, your question doesn't make sense. Seriously.