Same here, Bybee. Which goes back to the sentiment of these threads.
Men committing crimes and those crimes being blamed on women. It's an extremely twisted mindset.
Anyone Who Thinks Another Person Deserves To Be Raped Is A Knob
- Thread starter Arthur Brain
- Start date
- Status
Same here, Bybee. Which goes back to the sentiment of these threads.
Men committing crimes and those crimes being blamed on women. It's an extremely twisted mindset.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
I lost count- is this the 6th or 7th time I've been insinuated as being this mystical poster :think:
And by the same few people. I mean, get over your paranoia. You just sound ridiculous now, it's been like a monthlain:
oh, they'll keep at it for years
:doh:
wot
a
retard
Yeah, let's make a thread about women divorcing men and taking all they worked hard for.
And then we'll watch you do what you do best. Perhaps someone will counter it with a thread called 'Anyone who brings up women's faults is a knob'.
I mean, I've sat through this thread and watch everyone basically make no aim at the women and what they should realize of themselves or try to better of themselves. It stayed utterly on men, which was followed before and then followed up with other threads aiming at men with the same thing. And as soon as the direction even goes to women, it's automatically 'misogynist'. 'Sexist'. 'Wahh'.
You know what speaks to me as? 'Male hostages' and 'subtle misandry'.
Is rape a women's issue? How do you figure?
I'm generally suspicious that both tend to be oversimplifications.
lain:As long as you don't take them seriously any less.
But you've only been here how long?
While it wasn't appreciated, it only proved what I already knew: morality is considered subjective based on the individual rather than the act.
Off and on for several years ... with whatever new name he could slip through the door.
glorydaz
Well-known member
:e4e:
glorydaz
Well-known member
Town has the gall to suggest this gem by Crucible...
Can be improved upon. Town thinks his suggestion is "less likely to engender a lasting" "negatie" and "personal opinion".
Town is a victim of his own pride. It's no wonder he gets his feelings hurt when anyone dares to call him on his claptrap.
glorydaz
Well-known member
It's why we can't assume anything around here. Humanism is "Christian in Name Only". It's only when questions of right and wrong come up that the exposure begins. Man has his own set of morals and his own principles.
glorydaz
Well-known member
No, that may be what some of you women think we're discussing, or would prefer to discuss, but we're actually discussing the women who have acted like sluts (to use the current correct vernacular).
That is true.
Christians who go to humanism or otherwise overly liberal thinking hold to Christianity- up until something disagrees with humanism or liberal ideology.
If a part of the Scriptures do not line up with them, they simply bend it to say what they want- or sometimes just flat out ignore it completely.
That called being a religious dissident, and they ultimately make a false image of their religion. That is why Christianity today is becoming lukewarm.
glorydaz
Well-known member
No, I was giving you a perfect example of reaping what you sow. You were discussing Doser's personal affairs. Do you honestly think you won't reap the consequences of doing that? You think you're somehow immune?
glorydaz
Well-known member
Yep, and that "false image" has mankind sitting on the throne in the place of the One True God. It's why they insist God would NEVER do such and such. If they think it's not right then it's not right. Period. But, God's ways are not man's way, no matter how hard that is for man to accept. They will argue with their last breath that a stripper does not deserve to reap consequences due to her immoral behavior. They even think they get to decide what those consequences will or won't be if she has to reap any at all. :idunno:
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
even when they're shown scripture that directly and obviously proves them wrong :nono:
glorydaz
Well-known member
I know. It's interesting because those things they claim God would never do or allow are the same things atheists use as evidence for why they refuse to believe in a God who would do such things. The atheists know where to find all the verses that the humanist "Christians" refuse to see.... who stick their fingers in their ears and cry out "grace" as if grace keeps us from suffering in this life when we do wrong.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
when i showed one to town, he accused me using the scriptures like an "antheist"
and then he manufactured a reason to put me on ignore :darwinsm:
too bad really, because i was curious to hear how many "antheists" he knew that argued that God punishes the wicked :idunno:
| eta: i shoulda know'd better - he wasn't even that direct about it his quote: :darwinsm: |
and then he manufactured a reason to put me on ignore :darwinsm:
too bad really, because i was curious to hear how many "antheists" he knew that argued that God punishes the wicked :idunno:
glorydaz
Well-known member
And to think I almost missed this. :first:
glorydaz
Well-known member
:rotfl: Doser was right....you did say that.
God is telling them what will happen when the Romans take their city. He isn't commanding the Romans to rape.
I think you belong in a corner.
Kinda like God is telling us we will reap what we sow....or like we are telling the stripper she will reap what she sows. God allowed the Romans to rape....just as God allows rapists to rape. You have claimed God would never do that. Maybe some time in a corner would be to your benefit.
lain:
Is rape a women's issue? How do you figure?
I'm generally suspicious that both tend to be oversimplifications.
As long as you don't take them seriously any less.
But you've only been here how long?
Crucible is a sock, no doubt
- Status