elohiym
Well-known member
Staying married to retain a certain benefit does not equal getting married in order to obtain a certain benefit.
Yes, it does.
There is no fraud.
I disagree.
Also, the rape admittance was done tongue in cheek to show the absurdity of the changes in rape definition.
He never met any rape definition unless he was penetrated, so no humor, no evidence of absurdity and no point. Some of us realize his intent was to provoke rape victims with his comments, which is a form of sexual abuse, in my opinion.
His posting of the Jodi Foster rape scene and subsequent comments suggest he gets off on the aestheticization of violence and so might also find gratification in abusing rape victims with his comments and disturbing images.
Any conviction would require evidence and tongue in check non sincere satirical admittance is not evidence in any serious courtroom.
It's possible the DOJ wouldn't take an interest in a troll maligning their definition of rape while proclaiming numerous times he was raped by his wife according to that definition and that he raped his wife according to that definition. It's also possible that they might investigate considering how nutjobs these days post outrageous things online before they perpetrate evil.
You guys want to destroy a guy because you hate his beliefs.
He will destroy himself so I don't have to think like that.
Any person secure in himself would never be so vindictive.
Isn't that a logical fallacy?
You guys will do nothing anyway because you know its a joke.
I'm not convinced it's entirely a joke.