Right Divider
Body part
Yes, it is. i.e., if someone is NOT found guilty... then they are NOT guilty.No, it isn't.
Yes, it is. i.e., if someone is NOT found guilty... then they are NOT guilty.No, it isn't.
A case not getting to court due to lack of evidence is not the same at all. I should have corrected your "dismissal" comment as this is not the same thing as a case being dismissed out of court.Yes, it is. i.e., if someone is NOT found guilty... then they are NOT guilty.
OK I was just trying to help.Well, for starters, you're dealing with a guy who doesn't consider it rape if a husband forces himself on his wife with 100% proof of guilt. He considers it..."something else". He'd find the husband innocent regardless.
He then concocts up this feeble scenario where guilt or innocence can't be established and like others here can't seem to understand that there isn't enough "evidence" for it to even get to court before a jury/judges ruling.
What's most telling is the amount of hang ups over the ludicrous legal aspect rather than the atrocious notion that a husband forcing himself on his wife is somehow not rape.
By all means carry on!OK I was just trying to help.
There is still settling, but the plates are not "still 'grinding to a halt' even today".I'm curious about geology as a discipline, and the biblical Flood.
Plate Tectonics Debunked- reopened
Is it possible that the continents drifting apart at a four-inches per year pace wrt the Americas and Europe & Africa is evidence of the biblical global Flood? Are the hydroplates still 'grinding to a halt' even today? I can't begin to imagine the momentum of a whole continent once it gets moving. It would take a whole lot of friction to bring it down to nothing.
From a geologist on the internet.There is still settling, but the plates are not "still 'grinding to a halt' even today".
I'm not so such about the plates "drifting" at all. Where did you get that information?
So, "not guilty" then, wot?I'd be abstaining.
Well then it must be trueFrom a geologist on the internet.
Is he a rapist?From a geologist on the internet.
Nope.So, "not guilty" then, wot?
So "guilty" then.Nope.
Nope.So "guilty" then.
Nope.
lol Arthur this is what I was trying to help with.Nope.
He said it was based on satellite measurements. Sounded legit, unimpeachable.Well then it must be true
Can a rapist reform? I think so. Even if JR Ewing never gets justice for his raping, he can still reform himself. He can acknowledge his rights violations as the serious felonious crimes that they are, repent, and stop being a rapist. I don't believe 'once a rapist always a rapist' though of course there's always recidivism risk with anybody and anything.Is he a rapist?
Can a rapist reform? I think so. Even if JR Ewing never gets justice for his raping, he can still reform himself. He can acknowledge his rights violations as the serious felonious crimes that they are, repent, and stop being a rapist. I don't believe 'once a rapist always a rapist' though of course there's always recidivism risk with anybody and anything.
Oh, I don't need the help but Stripe might appreciate it.lol Arthur this is what I was trying to help with.
Does that include husbands who force their wives into sex?Rapists should be, upon conviction, put to death.
Does that include husbands who force their wives into sex?