ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Not scripture.One of three kinds of men worthy of hate: a man lecherous in his dotage .
The KJV has it in its Apocrypha as:
an old adulterer that doateth
Try again.
Not scripture.One of three kinds of men worthy of hate: a man lecherous in his dotage .
We end up with a whole lot of sore feelings and a whole bunch of people banned. Just like last time.Never understood that. Some things have been debated for millennia. Nothing wrong with talking.
Considered Canon for Catholic and Eastern Orthodox.Not scripture.
The KJV has it in its Apocrypha as:
an old adulterer that doateth
Try again.
You make it sound like the conscience is trustworthy. But if Christians need to "walk in the spirit" to produce love joy peace patience kindness goodness gentleness and self-control, how are non-believers going to be able to do those things? Artie said adultery might be permissible in some circumstances. He didn't want to talk about homosexuality being wrong. How much can you trust the conscience of an unbeliever?Why search the scripture for something that is clearly against the conscience of man....as God created us....thus man is without excuse.
In other words. There IS a RIGHT AND WRONG....no matter how some professing Christians might try and twist scripture to claim otherwise.
Regardless, clearly not talking about a married coupleConsidered Canon for Catholic and Eastern Orthodox.
Lecherous: having or showing excessive or offensive sexual desire as in going for it when partner is not ready. Men can be leches married or notRegardless, clearly not talking about a married couple
AdultererLecherous: having or showing excessive or offensive sexual desire as in going for it when partner is not ready. Men can be leches married or not
Most of the commentary and historicity that I can find include "adulterer"Adulterer
So you are defending the lecherous now? Got it.Most of the commentary and historicity that I can find include "adulterer"
Was Abraham lecherous?So you are defending the lecherous now?
Pretty sure Sarah was fully onboard.Was Abraham lecherous?
Was Sarah lecherous?Pretty sure Sarah was fully onboard.
Lechery has no component of mutual consent in any definition I've found. Like this from dictionary.com:Pretty sure Sarah was fully onboard.
Nope. She was skeptical.,.but ultimately willing.Was Sarah lecherous?
A married couple who make love on a public beach has been lecherous, have they not? It is broader than you think it is.Lechery has no component of mutual consent in any definition I've found.
No it's a moron problem. If grampa wants sex on vacation and engages his wive even though the grand kids are asleep in the next bed, is that NOT excessive because they are married? If the wife is recovering from a hysterectomy, is it excessive for hubby to insist on relations before the time the doctor advised against?Like this from dictionary.com:
"unrestrained or excessive indulgence of sexual desire."
"Within marriage" is a restraint, therefore you can't be monogamously lecherous. It's back to that oxymoron problem, again.
As if helping you get your definitions correct is a lack of self control?A married couple who make love on a public beach has been lecherous, have they not? It is broader than you think it is.
No it's a moron problem. If grampa wants sex on vacation and engages his wive even though the grand kids are asleep in the next bed, is that NOT excessive because they are married? If the wife is recovering from a hysterectomy, is it excessive for hubby to insist on relations before the time the doctor advised against?
Control yourselves gentlemen.
Weird, eh?As if helping you get your definitions correct is a lack of self control?
Apparently it isI'm asking you to SHOW the POST where someone said what YOU CLAIM that they said.
Is that too much to ask?
Unfortunately I am not capable of pointing immoral men/women to think beyond their ego, immorality and chauvinism. Pray. Pick up a Bible. Just don’t bother me with your self-serving male privilege.
No it most certainly is not Paul's!My contention is Paul's:
Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.