glorydaz
Well-known member
Paul did not say, "You are saved by believing without obeying".
He didn't have to....any more than he didn't say, 'you are saved by believing without being dunked under water'.
But he made it clear many times over.
Paul did not say, "You are saved by believing without obeying".
Tell me what we have to believe about Jesus to be saved.
Tell me why Paul told the believers that if they did not repent of their sins then God's wrath will come on them and that there is no favoritism because you say you believe.
As with some who profess they supposedly hold to "MAD"
Show me where Paul tells people they are saved by believing without obedience.
Show me where Paul tells people that if they repent of their sins then they condemn themselves.
Yeppers.That's what it plainly says.
You just don't like it.
Paul said 'law', not 'the' law.
He means any works of supposed merit.
Like all those "almost 28ers" here you never falsely slandered? Them the ones you mean?
He didn't have to....any more than he didn't say, 'you are saved by believing without being dunked under water'.
But he made it clear many times over.
Yeppers.
Galatians 3:21 KJV
(21) Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
You've been shown. Go back and read Jerry's posts.
Paul doesn't tell people that one way or another. Twisting your words around doesn't make them any truer than they were the first time. :duh:
Sho nuff.
It's uncanny how Meshak shifts vocabulary from severely limited to downright verbose and grammatically correct. It's almost as if...as if... :think:
You poor thing.
As with some who profess they supposedly hold to "MAD" you also read Romans 1:18 thru 3:20 INCORRECTLY.
That section of Romans is detailing PAST history of God's dealings with man, and man's PAST rebellions (plural) to same.
That, and what God HAD proved through that about what man deserves, and why, and why man CONTINUES TO deserve His wrath.
"BUT NOW..."
O but that "BUT NOW..." - Romans 3:21's RETURN TO...where Paul left off so majestically - Romans 1:17.
Romans 1:17 - the very SPARK that set off that GREAT fire that had so lit ALL Europe ABLAZE - The Protestant Reformation - Amen!
Like all those "almost 28ers" here you never falsely slandered? Them the ones you mean?
Paul would not say we didn't have to be water baptized, nor would he say we do not have to obey to be saved.
I will always be right and you will always be wrong, for I preach obedience to Christ.
Even a little child can rebuke you.
Ask a 7 year old child if we have to obey Jesus.
You are a deceived adult that should be embarrassed to preach.
I will always be right and you will always be wrong, for I preach obedience to Christ.
Even a little child can rebuke you.
Ask a 7 year old child if we have to obey Jesus.
You are a deceived adult that should be embarrassed to preach.
Paul did not say, "You are saved by believing without obeying".
Danoh,
shinsetsu na kotoba o aligato
Obedience is an outgrowth of believing in faith.