Do you deny what I said?
Please be kinder to our sister, Glorydaz et al.
Do you deny what I said?
Dan P the Great,
That is exactly what I believe. I can come to none other conclusion.
It sure appears to me by your quote in private that you understand them to believe there are two bodies, but then respond in the thread that they don't. I'm just trying to get your story straight as you seem to be giving conflicting reports. Now, you're saying it's how "we" understand what they believe, but in the pm you said, it is what "they" believe:I have already explained elsewhere on here that is how we within Mid-Acts see their (Acts 28) view - from within our own.
Actually, they believe that another Body (this is theirunderstanding of Ephesians 3's Mystery) began after Acts 28.
That the first Body is what Romans 16's Mystery is about - a Prophesied Body.
Which is it?Fact is, the 28ers do not believe there are two bodies, rather; that is what most who hold to Mid-Acts understand them as holding when looking at the 28ers' view from what ever our own happens to be.
It sure appears to me by your quote in private that you understand them to believe there are two bodies, but then respond in the thread that they don't. I'm just trying to get your story straight as you seem to be giving conflicting reports. Now, you're saying it's how "we" understand what they believe, but in the pm you said, it is what "they" believe:
and then in the thread, you say this.
Which is it?
Hi Dan,Hi and at one time we had 2 Acts 28 and I saw them bend so that they could take the Lord's supper in our assembly , so they can be brought !!
dan p
Nope. It is the Body of Christ.
I'm just weird that way - I tend try to see all things from all sides.
Cause I'm so darned curious about all sides.
So both are the Body of Christ despite the fact that you said those at Rome were not in the Body of Christ when Paul wrote these words:
"For as we have many members in one body, and all members have not the same office: So we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another" (Ro.12:4-5).
Once again, according to you at the time when Paul wrote those words those in the church at Rome were not in the Body of Christ.
Therefore, if you are right then the "body in Christ" mentioned at Romans 12:15 cannot possibly be the Body of Christ.
LOL Just be careful you're not so curious you start seeing sides that aren't sides.....like a six sided room that really only has four walls and four corners. A change in paint or texture can appear to be another side when it's not.
There were other ways and that was by hearing that truth preached by others:
ENT]
This one, on the other hand, can walk into a room and only see one side....the wall he happens to be facing.
Hi and us you know it is PAUL that was receiving CONTINUOUS REVELATIONS concerning the MYSTERY which are many , like 2 Cor 12:1 and 7 and Eph 3:3 and many other verses !!
Hi and us you know it is PAUL that was receiving CONTINUOUS REVELATIONS concerning the MYSTERY which are many , like 2 Cor 12:1 and 7 and Eph 3:3 and many other verses !!
dan p
Dan P the Great,
That is exactly what I believe. I can come to none other conclusion.
It was Paul who "became as a" that he might save some.Lol,
Where I am coming from on this is my sense of the Apostle Paul's "all things to all men, that I might win some..."
My sense of that is the issue of attempting to see another's side from where they are looking at things from, not from where I see things from, alone.
I don't think this good advice. I believe that is how people depart the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils (1 Timothy 4:1 KJV).I would suggest you each walk a mile in the other's perspective.
Anyway, hope this long wind results in a clear breeze, sis.
That's what you got out of my post.Lol, if you believe in breaking down a door and saying "here's the truth; now shut up and believe it," well, have at it, o passionate one. I'm sure there is a place for such a soapbox somewhere