SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
The question is when was the final judgment supposed to be. It was supposed to be right after the destruction of Jerusalem.
Made up.
The question is when was the final judgment supposed to be. It was supposed to be right after the destruction of Jerusalem.
He does sit on his throne now, and he warns all nations that he will be angry that they don't obey and regard him as king and lord now.
The final judgement is the only event we await and it is not split up into categories and nations and things for Israel. There was the DofJ in 70 but now there is no NT text about the 2nd coming in judgment that makes any distinctions.
Those do not return to the "final judgment" either.I guess Ps 2:10-12 and Acts 24:25 are not in your Bible!
Those do not return to the "final judgment" either.
You really should have your insanity checked, it's getting pretty bad.Another dictated toot from D'ism, ie, a "twot". Two of everything, two gods in Gal 2:8, since there are two gospels in v7, etc.
NT Christian faith didn't have the twots. It was clear and compelling.
You really should have your insanity checked, it's getting pretty bad.
In your grammar, if v7 has two gospels, v8 has two gods.
Are there bibles out there with little green lights for people like RD who think that 'the judgement to come' in 24:25 is not the judgement to come?
From everything Paul said he expected the DofJ anytime, and the final judgement right after. I'm refering to 20 instances at least, including when telling people whether to marry in I cor 7.
Every fricking thing that gets quoted is an exception to people like STP or RD that has a 2nd meaning, which only validates what I said about the "twots."
Are there bibles out there with little green lights for people like RD who think that 'the judgement to come' in 24:25 is not the judgement to come?
From everything Paul said he expected the DofJ anytime, and the final judgement right after. I'm refering to 20 instances at least, including when telling people whether to marry in I cor 7.
Every fricking thing that gets quoted is an exception to people like STP or RD that has a 2nd meaning, which only validates what I said about the "twots."
fricking thing
They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar...
There you go again, saint john, playing the dialectic game.Did your parents have any kids, that lived?Curious. You're a mite culiar("The English")..
vs.
Thanks for unpacking that for us, Jethro.
There you go again, saint john, playing the dialectic game.
I have a fracturized compelsion complex, Seymour. so quit giving me the business.
Look Elizabeth, Interloper can lend you several dozen commentaries to get you up to speed on the mission.
Just leave a comment on his The YouTube channel.
Another dictated toot from D'ism, ie, a "twot". Two of everything, two gods in Gal 2:8, since there are two gospels in v7, etc.
NT Christian faith didn't have the twots. It was clear and compelling.
"If you give a mouse a cookie..."You give this boob one comment, he'll want 2.....You give this rat 2 comments, he'll want 3....Oh, good day to you, Sir Knight! I was just sharing with brother Wallace STP, how refreshing it is to have gentleman Jim Interplanner, gleaning from the bible, wisdom for us misguided dispensationists..
This mystery has nothing to do with the church.