A Final Answer to One Continuous 2P2P Demand

Danoh

New member
2P2P continually demands that we read the Bible without the NT.

Sorry, no can do.

The agenda behind your every OP is obvious but to those who bite only due to what is their own need to live for conflict...

Matthew 22:35 Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying,
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
2P2P continually demands that we read the Bible without the NT.

Sorry, no can do.

What about those who had the OT before the NT came into existence? Were they unable to understand the revelation from the LORD found in the OT? What did they think when they read this passage?:

"And what one nation in the earth is like thy people, even like Israel, whom God went to redeem for a people to himself, and to make him a name, and to do for you great things and terrible, for thy land, before thy people, which thou redeemedst to thee from Egypt, from the nations and their gods? For thou hast confirmed to thyself thy people Israel to be a people unto thee for ever: and thou, LORD, art become their God" (2 Sam.7:23-24).​

Were the Jews being deceived when they were told that the nation which He redeemed out of Egypt will be the LORD's people for ever?
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
This guy Interplanner doesn't give up




When the parasitic system never does Acts 2, 13, 15, 26 correctly,...
when it majors on the one things 'we are not supposed to know'...
when it says there is no redemptive cross in Acts 2 and the 'remission' (payment) for sins had just been mentioned 2 chapters earlier by that same author...
when it finds two of everything where the NT says there is one...
when it allows James to jerk the text around in Acts 15...
when Acts 26 says we aren't to be teaching anything beyond what the prophets said would happen: the sacrifice of Christ and his mission...

What's the question? It is obviously a cult.
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
When the parasitic system never does Acts 2, 13, 15, 26 correctly,...
when it majors on the one things 'we are not supposed to know'...
when it says there is no redemptive cross in Acts 2 and the 'remission' (payment) for sins had just been mentioned 2 chapters earlier by that same author...
when it finds two of everything where the NT says there is one...
when it allows James to jerk the text around in Acts 15...
when Acts 26 says we aren't to be teaching anything beyond what the prophets said would happen: the sacrifice of Christ and his mission...

What's the question? It is obviously a cult.

:chuckle:
Poor IP
 
Top