31 Reasons To Reject The Jab

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
This left 127 people who received the vaccine in the first two trimesters, 104 of whom (82%) had miscarriages.

The study examined the records of 827 respondents who had been given a Covid-19 vaccine and had a completed pregnancy, which means the pregnancy had ended in a live birth, spontaneous or induced abortion, stillbirth or ectopic pregnancy.

It found that 13.9% of those respondents reported a pregnancy loss, of which 12.6% were miscarriages. This is similar to the proportion of pregnancies sadly expected to end in miscarriage regardless of vaccine status.

The article claims the true miscarriage rate was 82%. This was calculated by excluding all 700 participants who had live births who were vaccinated in their third trimester.
 

marke

Well-known member
Leftist rubes do not do their own studies but they claim studies others do are not asccurate.
Phizer has asked for something like 80 years to disclose its safety research on the covid vaccine. They apparently do not want the public to find out what they did in their clinical trials.

However, Phizer never tested the effects of its covid vaccine on pregnant women, so they don't have a clue whether the vaccine causes miscarriages or not. That is a pretty poor position from which to imperiously declare that their vaccine does not have bad effects on pregnant women.


Many pregnant persons in the United States are receiving messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccines, but data are limited on their safety in pregnancy.

The first coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccines available in the United States were messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines: BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna). In December 2020, the vaccines were granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a two-dose series, 3 weeks apart for Pfizer–BioNTech and 1 month apart for Moderna, and were recommended for use by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).1-4 Pregnant persons were excluded from preauthorization clinical trials, and only limited human data on safety during pregnancy were available at the time of authorization.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Here is a quote from your source, proving these people don't really know much about how their vaccine affects pregnant women.

Many pregnant persons in the United States are receiving messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccines, but data are limited on their safety in pregnancy.

So you admit that you don't really know much about how the vaccines affect pregnant women and that the one study that was done showed that miscarriages were within the normal range and that the claim that the study showed 82% of pregnant women who got vaccinated miscarried is a straight-up lie? Got it.
 

marke

Well-known member
So you admit that you don't really know much about how the vaccines affect pregnant women and that the one study that was done showed that miscarriages were within the normal range and that the claim that the study showed 82% of pregnant women who got vaccinated miscarried is a straight-up lie? Got it.
Leftists lie about covid and they lie about the vaccine and people die.
 

way 2 go

Well-known member

UK government scraps mandatory COVID vaccinations for NHS and social care workers​


The mandatory vax requirement will be reversed after warnings that nearly 80,000 health care workers would be forced out of their jobs.

 

way 2 go

Well-known member
TOKYO, Jan 31 (Reuters) - Japanese trading and pharmaceuticals company Kowa Co Ltd (7807.T) on Monday said that anti-parasite drug ivermectin showed an "antiviral effect" against Omicron and other coronavirus variants in joint non-clinical research.

The company, which has been working with Tokyo's Kitasato University on testing the drug as a potential treatment for COVID-19, . . . .



the rest of the story is
Screenshot_2021-12-26 The coronavirus scam.png
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
If you think of the virus as basically a chemical, and if this chemical were a bottled liquid, it would be marked with the skull-and-crossbones poison label.

It kills a lot of people, even still today, right now, somewhere, someone else is succumbing to the thing.

But compared to the dose that can be fatal for all other chemicals, even things like nerve gas and arsenic, the virus dose can be very, very minimal, and it can still kill you. I know that people with certain conditions are the ones most likely to struggle with the thing, but that doesn't make it any less poisonous, just objectively.

fwiw
 

musterion

Well-known member
When left leaning governments lift lockdowns and mandates, what does that mean?

a. They're clearing the decks for a new crisis because this one is played out.

b. They're indicating that, as predicted, strains are progressively less virulent.

c. They want people to believe it's because the shots work, even though nearly fully jabbed countries still have some of the highest rates of infection and reinfection.

d. They're trying to make people not notice the increasing exposure of astounding illegalities, lies, and malfeasance relating to the big pharma.
 
Top