so fake pic or not, those liberals nuts agree with the message there.
At least the author addressed his error and made a public apology.
Where lies your integrity?
so fake pic or not, those liberals nuts agree with the message there.
They are comments that men frustrated with women would say.
I don't agree with them, but I know why they exist.
The message is not the messages themselves, but the reason they were posted.
Not too many decades ago, men wouldn't be that way.
But for this generation, men have had to deal with not only outrageous misandry and having everything blamed on them, but they even have their lives marred routinely by women.
It's an everyday thing in this country, with many men. But feminism is a mechanism to ignore this reality and focus solely on women- even when they are already over privileged.
Bottom line, some men are treating women the same as they would a man who transgressed them the same.
At least the author addressed his error and made a public apology.
Where's your integrity?
Suffrage wasn't a revolt against imaginary oppression.
Securing fair play in the work environment isn't a struggle against an imaginary resistance.
The last one seems like a vague slam routine, though there's nothing wrong with fighting for equality.
Of course she knows there are misogynists in the world. Most women have known at least one. If they're lucky it was in passing.
He didn't even suggest that women's sufferage wasn't valid.
It's the last one that shows where we are NOW, and that some refuse to acknowledge (as you just did). There most certainly IS something wrong with "fighting for equality" if you lie and distort and attempt to take away the rights of others.
The "vague slam routine" is what the Rusha's of the world are doing.
yes, to shut down conversation, because thats ALL the left CAN do, because they have illegitimate nonsensical illogical arguments, so they scream you down to wear you down and shut you down, because thats all they have.
Well, they do have to stick to the script.
Nah, though males with the mentality of little boys are . They consider themselves oppressed because they are no longer in control of women.
They believe that patriarchy exists outside of their misogynistic little minds.
I think that's called attacking the messenger.
The pic itself being legit or not has NOTHING to do with the FACT that they AGREED with the sentiment.
That!INDOCTRINATION
All I'm saying is don't judge/defame the movement by the radicals who misrepresent it.
:rotfl:
Radicals ARE the movement. He knows that, too. They all lie like their father, every one of them.
Radicals ARE the movement. He knows that, too. They all lie like their father, every one of them.
You know all about lying, but then you've had a lot of practice.
You know all about lying, but then you've had a lot of practice.
You know all about lying, but then you've had a lot of practice.
I don't suppose you'd care to address the comments made at American Thinker?
You know all about lying, but then you've had a lot of practice.
I don't suppose you'd care to address the comments made at American Thinker? I noticed you felt up to making an appearance in your thread after your reinforcements showed up.
I know, thats why i have to laugh at what he said. The statement reeked of desperation.
Isn't it interesting how not a one of these little men have a problem with the photoshop or the sexually violent comments made by the conservatives at American Thinker? What a bunch of neanderthals.
They're the sort of comments that someone lacking in character would say. Why a man feels justified about being that isn't compelling. What's compelling is a complaint from and illustrating character.They are comments that men frustrated with women would say.
Because the people who posted them lack a fundamental decency and can't recognize the indefensible nature of their conduct.The message is not the messages themselves, but the reason they were posted.
Domestic violence is and has been a generational problem and so is the sort of attitude that makes allowance for it.Not too many decades ago, men wouldn't be that way.
What outrageous misandry are you referring to?But for this generation, men have had to deal with not only outrageous misandry
Such as?and having everything blamed on them,
Marred how?but they even have their lives marred routinely by women.
I'll tell you what's statistically an actual and more demonstrably prevalent occurance every day: domestic violence. It's almost entirely male and it's ugly, frequently brutal. What empowers it to some extent is the attitude that women on some level, may have it coming to them.It's an everyday thing in this country, with many men.
Feminism has mostly been like a union, representing a particular interest, in this case one that is routinely on the short, dismissive end of the stick.But feminism is a mechanism to ignore this reality and focus solely on women- even when they are already over privileged.
Women asking for equality isn't a transgression.Bottom line, some men are treating women the same as they would a man who transgressed them the same. Equality, right?