Search results

Who, exactly, is campaigning to have these monuments destroyed?

Shh, you're interrupting her flow with 'whiny liberal nonsense'... :nono:

I guess more pics of statues and the like it is then. Still, better than those 'The Duke' videos... :Plain:

Has this turned into the statute thread? - sorry, statue thread...

At least you're capable of appreciating it...

Ya gotta love irony... :chuckle:

Even if we did we wouldn't be as 'offline' as some folk around here... :D

Well, you've just told me directly although as you can imagine, your personal opinion of me doesn't exactly mean much. :e4e:

Ah, not so because you're not on her ignore list and you've quoted me. :D Hopefully now she'll stop wasting her time.

Even more ironic considering A4T keeps asking anna questions and making barbs even though she's been on ignore for a year or so... Curious.

Someone tell A4T that anna has her on ignore and has done for ages...

As I was 'removed from the discussion' over in the "5 pillars of Mohammedanism" thread then this is a reply to 'Dodge' from that very convo: http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?124932-Dad-goes-off-on-school-board-for-teaching-the-5-pillars-of-Mohammedanism&p=5015879&viewfull=1#post5015879...

Seeing as you've locked your thread then allow me to answer here and without all the troll like crap: "Ah, now old evasive AB kicks in. So the bottom line is, your question was never genuine but was just a trap you thought you'd lay for me. That about it?" No. :e4e:

When they advocate things that would effectively silence any dissenting voice to the point of them being executed for indulging in practices or beliefs that wouldn't align with their perceived 'status quo'? The Following archive thread being a case in point...

Well, according to venerated and scholarly accredited historian Pastor Scott Lively, he may very well be... :shocked: GWc8FFm8tOI aCW, take note... :eek:

He wasn't working and he begged for food. Why was the rich man wrong in denying him even the scraps of food off his table? Plenty here seem to think that those who don't work shouldn't eat so does this apply to all the homeless 'bums' and those down on their luck as well?

Brought to you by the same services that proved Buck Rogers actually did come from the 25th century and Gil Gerard was a packet of cornflakes. In other news the incredible hulk is a Tibetan manuscript and Roger Moore actually is James Bond!! :shocked:

Music you find boring? Foodstuffs you recoil at? Reality TV if you cringe at it? This is an offshoot from a conversation with Glassjester where he proposes that people can train themselves to enjoy things they have an aversion to. I say it's bunk and there's no evidence to support it...

http://www.missionalwear.com/ Ok, what's the point? Anyone who's part of the 'elect' doesn't need to see it and how does it evangelize anything? Or is it ordained by God that Calvinists wear such apparel to goad reprobate 'tree huggers'? :idunno:

Well, okay, the obvious answer is no but given that some here seem to think that any sort of 'non virtuous' sexual life can somehow lead towards developing homosexual desires if straight I'd be interested in hearing just how that happens... :think: