Search results

I can see by this post that you have no way to refute what @JudgeRightly has written, so you pick the one part to quote that has no scripture in it, and merely argue with it like a child. Grow up, b57, and read scripture for what it can teach you, rather than to squeeze your own message out of it.

John 11:50 has Caiaphas using “whole” with “nation” in a similar way that “whole” goes with “world” in 1John 2:2. It means entire or all of. So your own passages refute your interpretation. But just because Jesus died for the whole world, doesn’t mean He’s going to gather the whole world. Those...

And colonialists.

I don’t think that’s possible.

If you don't condone any falsity against anyone, then why won't you admit The Hill and others reported falsely what Cotton said about the deleted files? There were files. They were in a deleted state. Cotton and his team (or just himself, idk) were able to recover them. This doesn't mean the...

So you did give some appearance of misgivings? I think it would be much easier for you to prove me wrong than for me to prove a negative. To help you, here's my negative statement that has you so up in arms: To put to rest the argument about your opinion about misgivings about Trump/Russia...

Thanks ffree. It baffles me, but I guess that's what a depraved mind looks like. Just for a review: I'm accusing Brain of passing on information about Ben Cotton that was false, was confirmed to be false by Cotton himself, after I had showed him why it was false, but he insists it has nothing...

I'm at a loss how else to communicate this to you. I swear I thought that you actually could communicate in English, but maybe it's a one-way filter. See if this appropriately named movie clip can help you understand my frustration:

Why are you here, then? You've just said you don't agree that news organization NEED to tell the truth, yet you think The Gateway Pundit is somehow at fault for when you think they don't. Just what is your standard, Brain? And what are you looking to get people to do with your posts? Based...

So you do think lying is a problem? So you agree with me that when The Hill or any other source says Ben Cotton said the files were not deleted, and he didn’t say that, that they could have been lying, or “bearing false witness”? And if you repeated that information but have not reversed your...

I’ve been giving examples of your double standards. Why do I need to always give more than I’ve given already? That’s a double standard right there, as you don’t require it of yourself. I’ll wager you have never said, “Don’t believe what I’ve written, unless I provide more evidence than I have...

Once a person only accepts his own standards, it’s never possible for him to admit wrong. So the answer’s No.

You mean he's guilty until proven innocent? That's not how it works here. and again, you’re back to some standard that only you control—your opinion. Why should all news sites have to abide by that standard, especially when it’s duplicitous (that equates to hypocritical, as I’m sure you know)...

And I forgot to add that I'm sorry you're embarrassed when your media sources are shown to be fraudulent over the very thing you're claiming to be a fraud. Troll Hypocrisy #7

Troll Hypocrisy #6: why do require "objective, rational standards" for others, when you don't for yourself?

That was the same question I had about TGP and your hoops. Yet you still maintain that TGP is bad, and yours are good, purveyors of truth. Including about this particular issue where TGP reported correctly and yours reported falsely. Troll Hypocrisy #1 I agree! So why is your darling MSM...

If your sources said that Ben Cotton claimed the databases were not deleted (which they did), but Ben Cotton reiterated that he never said that (which he did), then those news sources you relied on have given false information. You tell me: Are they 1. crazy (in which case you should not rely...

Did we lose @iansmithedi ?

Don’t forget CNN and The Hill: https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/554250-firms-behind-arizona-election-audit-reverse-say-no-data-was-destroyed Though I don’t think they are crazy; I think they are purposely lying to their readers/viewers. Crazy is less morally at fault than lying. But you...

But you can't use anything from NewsNet. NewsNet is not an Arthur-Brain-approved source of evidence. That's because it reports news that is not in keeping with Arthur Brain's understanding of truth. All potential truth sources have to apply to @Arthur Brain for approval. Unfortunately, even the...