Search results

A rapist is a rapist if they force themselves on another, whether in or outside of marriage. Simple stuff. Fact. Still don't like it? Eh, boo hoo. Doesn't alter the fact. Of course if you had a clue as to what loving and cherishing another actually means you'd not be defending it as "something...

Except you're not an advocate for free speech anyway.

Don't need to thanks. Forcing sex on your wife or anyone else is rape, fact.

Nope. Then again, if you're not familiar with marriage vows or what to love and cherish actually mean in relation then no wonder you're reduced to "something else" time and again. Go read Clete's post on the score. You have no defense on this and if you truly knew what it is to love and cherish...

Yeppers. He would rightfully be charged with rape. Don't like it, meh, go cry into a glass of milk "or something".

Nah, not really. Too many sane folks around to regard Rumble or Truth Social as viable so regardless of the bat crazy who endorse them the sanity offsets it thankfully. Kinda why outfits like Q have a following but are generally regarded as nuts.

Well, with you, a "leftist" can be anyone who doesn't veer to the far right regardless. Your post, of course, is nonsense. Chock full of predictable and unsubstantiated hyperbole as per usual. You pretend to care but you don't else you wouldn't post such garbage and misrepresent folk so much...

I was correct as it stands. He would rightfully be charged with rape.

It is not "liberal" to call a spade a spade or in this case - rape. Just because a couple are married does not equate to a husband being entitled to sex as he sees fit and forcing himself on his unwilling spouse. There's no justification for that and good luck finding it Biblically as Clete...

Try explaining that to Derf then because there's no disagreement between us (for once) on that score so read things properly yourself. Oh, and get some new material anyway...

Well, it's hardly gutter language but it's often abused by trolls and the like.

Funny, I seem to recall you saying that if you were a mod on here then you'd ban all sorts of people from posting, from Catholics to atheists etc. Completely at odds with the founder of the forum and the ethos laid out. Conservative bias for sure but welcome to all. What was that about hypocrisy...

He would rightfully be charged with rape because that's what he'd be guilty of. No further explanation necessary and those who try to shroud it in other terminology such as "something else" or make excuses for it have no justification for it. It generally isn't worth your time trying to explain...

It isn't and yeah, it is. Go waffle on about "something else".

Good, let her show herself up some more.

No, fact. It's rape, pure and simple. That you can't define what this "something else" of yours actually consists of reflects solely on you.

Would be ironic...

Why? Cos some nutcases like MTG are allowed back on? She didn't exactly get much support from her 'fellow republicans' when she was booted from the platform did she? Heck, let her back on and Trump for that matter. They did their own causes more harm than good while tweeting away like nutters...

Ironic that he appeared on an episode of 'The Big Bang Theory' volunteering at a soup kitchen and saying how good it was to help the homeless...

Nope. Got anything as to how rape in a marriage is "something else" yet?