Search results

Says a man who after being banned, willfully masqueraded on here as a 21 year old female co-ed and denied it until finally the mods had enough. It's not so much that you tried to circumvent your ban but why you chose to come back on here pretending to be the above. What was going on with that...

Um, nah. Most American voters wanted the bronzed buffoon out of office and democracy prevailed. That's the rub. You don't get to cry foul and ride roughshod over all of those who wanted a different result to you and got it. Plenty had to suck it up when Trump won in 2016 without this much cringe...

As is yours with mine, hardly breaking news RD. I'm bemused as to why you bothered engaging at all.

Well, let God judge in His own time then as your views can be dismissed easily enough in the meantime. This was addressed to a guy who has a beef with homosexuals/transgenders and who supports the ex president who advocates their having rights. Not even sure why you waded in on this anyway. Nah.

Wow, for once I kinda agree with you. Plus, methods for bronze age tribes that the Bible describes at the time hardly apply to now when we have much more accurate and reliable methods to determine guilt/innocence. Not infallible certainly and the systems we have still make mistakes even with...

If you were such an 'expert' you wouldn't have come up with such a lame soundbite like this. Patently ridiculous.

How so? You speak as though it's an either/or which is a fallacy in itself. Why can't it be possible to stringently ascertain guilt before executing someone and keep those where there's doubt in custody until their guilt or innocence is established also without risking letting them back into...

I support human rights and far right religious wingnuts and zealots can carry on being puffed up little blowhards as much as they like. That is their prerogative after all and I support contrary views as asinine as they are to be aired. The reality is that their self righteous condemnation of...

Or you in turn. This was fun wasn't it?

About as well thought out as one could expect really.

Of course not, but it's a glaring double standard from wingnuts who declare it to be a hallmark of 'democrats' when they venerate a former president who supported such rights himself.

Nah, I deny it because it's pathetic bunk that was invented by a loon who makes up his own "facts" as he goes along. Here's an actual fact for you: Trump is pro homosexual/transgender rights. Got anything to say about that?

Done that plenty of times thanks.

Eh, don't hold any whacked out conspiracy theory views or akin but thanks anyway!

Of course I deny it, this is just another wingnut rant of yours that has as much grounding in reality as one of My Pillow Guy's tirades. Oh, just to remind you once again - Trump is pro homosexual/transgender rights. Any comment on that?

Hey, if she recants her loony conspiracy theories then fair enough. About the only sensible move for her to make really.

You do realize that Trump is all in favour of Homosexual/Transgender rights, right?

No need to be sorry, I expect this sort of stuff from far right loons. Certainly don't expect balanced, well reasoned and thoughtful posits...

NIce rant there. 'LOL'.

Well, you ought to care considering you tout Fox News as one of the networks to follow so presumably that includes its hosts. It's reported all over that Hannity, when asked about 2020 election fraud responded with “I did not believe it for one second,”...