Search results

No, I answered your question directly regarding "should a person be allowed to get away with a crime", not whether criminals should be allowed to get away with them. You've had it fully - several times. No, they should not - provided they're old enough and possess sufficient mental acuity to be...

Yeah, he's the MAGA loony in that pic. Thankfully, the sane world are a bit more savvy than the wingnut brigade....

Then "ding" me JR. Not jumping through your hoops so meh.

Apart from the fact that I answered you several times. Never once have I stated that a criminal should get away with a crime as you accused me of. Care to retract? Ironically enough, Clete did answer you on the score where it comes to five year olds, something I did at the time this particular...

You'll find out if you read it. I provided the evidence so read it or don't. I know it's in depth and a long read so up to you. It's not just you where it comes to social media, I'm a bit more savvy than to buy into preconceived talking heads to confirm bias is all.

Oh, he does. We had this "merry go round" a few years ago. He thinks children as young as five can be executed for "capital crimes".

Well, by that reasoning, Trump's posted plenty of deranged smut amid his entirely deranged so are you still an avid supporter?

Yes, but you're sensible!

I know it wasn't. That's why I've stated - even just in my above that we shouldn't allow a PERSON - NOT A CRIMINAL - to get away with a crime, provided that they're old enough to be held accountable for one. Geez...

If you cared enough you'd read it, it's all addressed, in detail and corroborated. You don't get to critique anybody else's intelligence when you're posting off 'YT, 'X' 'TikTok' etc and expect anything from talking heads to pass muster.

Wow, you need a reality check.

Yeah, neither do I...

Gordon Bennet, maybe I should post pics cos you sure don't seem to understand words too well. I'll see if all caps helps any. MY ANSWER HAS BEEN THERE FOR THE LAST DOZEN OR SO POSTS. WE SHOULD NOT ALLOW A PERSON TO GET AWAY WITH A CRIME - PROVIDED THEY'RE OLD ENOUGH TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR A...

Yeah, I don't use X at all.

I haven't dodged it at all and you know fine well that I haven't. Please carry on "not responding". Frankly, you're acting like a child with this.

No, I haven't. A five year old child is a person, yes, but they're not a criminal or held as accountable for their actions as an adult under law. You wanna keep beating this asinine drum of yours then go ahead.

This is a strange form of "not responding"... The law applies to adults so of course an adult with no mental impairment should not get away with a crime.

Actually, I'm kinda surprised you're using that meme considering that you think Leonardo Decaprio posed with a dead baby in a jar...

Um, you do realize that quite a few of the replies you'll get on X are deliberately sarky and ironic, yeah? No? Okay then.

Okay, whack a doodle...